Misrepresentation+5 Years inadmissibility
- Thread starter meyti
- Start date
You should NEVER misrepresent the information on applications. It’s in the data bank
So if I say yes and provide details about my US refusals would it help
PS: " actually I had 5 refusals" that was the reason why I didn't mention about it"
Did you mention any of the previous rejections? Continuing to lie will catch up to you at some point, including if you are a PR or citizen and can result in revocation of both. There is no statute of limitation for misrepresentation. Best to inform them and hope for the best.
No I did not mention any of the information regarding that I just said no and left it blank
If you had 5 refusals and failed to mention them, I would strongly recommend you consult a very good immigration lawyer. A lawyer cannot magically fix this problem but can hopefully advise you on the best course of action.
If you ever plan on applying for PR, you'll definitely need to mention the 5 refusals or you'll end up with a misrepresentation finding and a ban.
Five refusals is a lot to fail to mention. Get legal advice.
No, this is not true. Misrepresentation can affect any and all future applications.
You quit your job in December, thereby making her ineligible for a work permit, but you didn't inform IRCC - and your permit was issued well after you quit. That's an issue.
What proof do you have that your permit was approved in December? Do you have a letter from your MP's office that states this?
What kind of work permit were you working on when you applied for her OWP? A PGWP?
The TRV and the work permit are two different things. By not informing IRCC that you quit your job while your application was pending I believe you may have committed misrepresentation.
It doesn't matter that you thought it was approved - the fact is, the work permit says it was approved on Jan 30th, which means that an IRCC officer looked at your file sometime before Jan 30th, and approved it on the basis of you having a NOC 0,A,B job - which wasn't true. If you had informed them that you weren't working, they would have denied the OWP - hence it's withholding a material fact that caused an error in the administration of the Act.
In addition, when she landed, did the CBSA officer directly ask her about your job? If yes, and she didn't tell the truth, that's definitely misrepresentation. You can't claim that her English wasn't good enough etc - that kind of excuse won't work if they look into the matter.
Based on what you're telling us, I feel that yes, you did commit misrepresentation here, but let's wait and see what other people say.
You may want to talk to a immigration attorney as well. The details matter in a case like yours, and it's hard to give a concrete answer without knowing all the facts.
urgent help please
Hello Everyone
Quick question
In year 2015 I was applied for visitors visa with Retail sales supervisor job title (Noc code 6211) 2013 to 2015 & it was rejected.
So now I applied for sinp paper based applications and in work experience I mention in the year of 2013 to 2015 Retail Merchandise (Noc code 6222). So it will make any negative impact or charge me misrepresentation on application.
My status as per gcms notes from last month
Eligibility : Passed
Criminality : Passed
Medical : Passed
Security : Not Started
Thanks in advance
Hello Everyone
Quick question
In year 2015 I was applied for visitors visa with Retail sales supervisor job title (Noc code 6211) 2013 to 2015 & it was rejected.
So now I applied for sinp paper based applications and in work experience I mention in the year of 2013 to 2015 Retail Merchandise (Noc code 6222). So it will make any negative impact or charge me misrepresentation on application.
My status as per gcms notes from last month
Eligibility : Passed
Criminality : Passed
Medical : Passed
Security : Not Started
Thanks in advance
Did you work in Canada from 2013-2015, or was this job outside Canada?
If the job was outside Canada, then no, it won't be misrepresentation. I assume the 2015 application was simply for a visitor visa, so your NOC code really had nothing to do with that application.
It was in India not in Canada. I was applied for visitor visa for Canada from India.
Your chances may be good, but I assume that you're including your wife in the application, right? So they will look at the application as a whole, and if they feel you committed misrepresentation, they will ask you to explain.
If you are asked about it (and remember, you may not be), I would not recommend your current line of argument. You cannot say that you committed misrepresentation because they didn't follow procedures. That kind of argument is doomed to fail - whether they followed procedures or not, it doesn't somehow grant you a license to commit misrepresentation.
There's really nothing you can do about this now. Apply with a truthful application, and if it does so happen they ask you to explain something, talk to a lawyer and make an argument that carries weight. Don't try and apply a layman's understanding to something like this.
If they don't ask, then you'll be fine and you'll get your PR.