I really do not understand all these justifications put forward for this current situation, like
* No one will travel anyway (everyone needs to travel sooner or later, according to their personnel situation)
* Most PR are inside Canada (Not all are inside and some can get trapped/delayed abroad)
* IRCC can not work remotely (Many government agents are already working remotely)
* PR cards are not a priority (yes they are not a priority, but 0% processing since Feb 10, 2020!!!)
* Few people work in IRCC (all provinces are reopening, is it this dangerous to work in IRCC offices? they do not interact with the public)
Nothing really that justifies the 10 months processing times.
I suspect there are two very different discussions taking place in this topic. Which, actually, is not at all unusual here.
Most of what you list as "justifications," are offered merely as explanations or descriptions about what is actually happening, with some reference to why, the latter more or less to help put the *what* into context. The overriding *what* being the relegation of PR card processing to a low priority with the rather obvious result that it is going to be a long while before PRs are issued and delivered a new PR card.
But as more than a few recent posts suggest, even if there is scant direct evidence, at least some here are optimistic that things are headed toward improvement, despite apprehending there will be a new-normal rather than the pre-Covid-19 normal, and even though there is little promise, if any, about how quickly IRCC will get things more or less back on track (with the probability leaning toward less).
I suppose the main disconnect could be rooted in the effort of many here to stay focused on practical information which affected PRs can consider in making personal decisions versus the intrusion of activist rhetoric. Nothing wrong with the latter, per se, but more than a few of those who make an effort to help are more focused on the former, helping each other figure out what is going on and how to better navigate it going forward, which includes monitoring changes and watching for signs of progress.
I suppose some may have difficulty sorting and distinguishing commentary about one versus the other, and sure it can be confusing if someone is looking for personal action-plan assistance, and rather than observations that will help figure out what options are actually and practically available (which requires a frank assessment of what is not realistically an option), for one as an individual with a compelling need to travel, they have to wade through what is more or less an activist agenda . . .
. . . and, perhaps just as confusing the other way around, for those looking for a more or less activist action-plan to influence how the government handles these matters but having to wade through explanations and descriptions of what is happening oriented toward a frank acknowledgement about the nature and scope of limited options currently available.
None of which is to pass judgment on the viability of advocating government change. But for those with real needs TODAY, confronted with making hard decisions today (such as whether to risk leaving Canada without a valid PR card), the activist-advocacy agenda does not offer much help in making those hard decisions. And, unfortunately, for the latter there is still rather little promise that IRCC will be making those decisions any easier any time soon.
I suppose those focused on the personal decision-making side find the other stuff about as tedious as the more activist-oriented find the
this-is-the-reality descriptions of what, at least on a personal level, a PR needs to deal with.
Leading to . . .
I see the times have changed again today (95 New) and 287 (renewal). Taking this with a pinch of salt....
Maybe keep a bucket of salt handy. Who knows what the latest timeline reporting is about?
Those affected may eventually be able to learn something of use from what IRCC posts about the timeline, but for now about all that can be reasonably discerned is that for processing PR card renewals it still appears that not much is happening.
Leading to
same old same old: those affected need to take the likelihood of a long wait into account in making personal decisions.