Did you just create your profile, because the Feb 19th draw was 470Does anyone know how could I apply for provincial nomination? CRS 470 and can't afford to wait for more time as birthday is approaching. Thinking about how to get the 600 points
Did you just create your profile, because the Feb 19th draw was 470Does anyone know how could I apply for provincial nomination? CRS 470 and can't afford to wait for more time as birthday is approaching. Thinking about how to get the 600 points
I didn't event think of this, it is very much possible as there is no end to "Immigration Agents" offering fake IELTS results and whatnot for swindling desperate people out of their money and they have fake EE profiles on officcial IRCC website to show people as proof.I do believe that is what is happening already. Especially by individuals trying to scam people for good ielts results without even attempting the test. They would try to create fake profiles and keep the CRS elevated to trap desperate people.
ECA and language test results are easy to fake, just take a legit ECA or TRF number and play with it until it lands on a valid report of someone else and enter those in all fake profiles, too easy.I've been thinking about this a lot actually.
How do we know that a lot of these high scoring profiles are not bogus? Is the system not open to manipulation?
I feel like IRCC should implement a preliminary analysis of the profile, where they verify the ECA number and language test result reference at least before profiles become active in the pool.
Unfortunately, that doesn't seem to be the case.I do believe that is what is happening already. Especially by individuals trying to scam people for good ielts results without even attempting the test. They would try to create fake profiles and keep the CRS elevated to trap desperate people.
Sure, but if they screen them, they will know that the legit ECA or TRF number will not correspond to the profile's name and details.ECA and language test results are easy to fake, just take a legit ECA or TRF number and play with it until it lands on a valid report of someone else and enter those in all fake profiles, too easy.
I would still like to know why the cutoff is the same even after increased number of ITA's, maybe if they can share the number of candidates between 460-480, we can get an idea.Unfortunately, that doesn't seem to be the case.
I've been gathering all sorts of possible data that I can regarding draws from the last year, and here's the graph for the average number of new candidates in the 450-1200 range, per day, in the last draws.
On draw 116, the one before FST draw in May 2019, the number of candidates added between draw 115 and 116 was 247 candidates/day.
The draw after the FST #117, had a 281 candidates/day average (again, this is for the 450-1200 range, I'm not considering the total amount of candidates in the pool).
Finally, this week's, March 4th, draw 138 had a 266 candidates/day average.
To sum it up: The average hasn't really changed THAT much since last year. Yes, it's trending upwards, but not drastically. What that means? That it's not a matter of a plethora of fake profiles entering the pool, but actually the quality of these profiles. If you imply that, let's say, half of the new profiles entering the pool are fakes, than you also need to imply that was the case in June 2019 as well, because the average candidates/day hasn't changed considerably.
NOTE: the spike in the graph happened in the B2B draw in December. Even though only 5 days passed between the 2 reference days*, the number of people in the pool remained close to the same amount, which indicates the influx of candidates between Dec 11th and Dec 16th was massive, for some mysterious reason (that's actually the only case where we could investigate a possible fraud regarding automatic profile creation)
* The graph was plotted based on the reference date for the breakdown of points published in every draw, instead of the actual date of the draws.
That would require IRCC to invest a lot in manually checking each and every EE profile that enters the pool which is not realistic and they would need a lot of manpower to get this done which I am sure they don't want to do.Sure, but if they screen them, they will know that the legit ECA or TRF number will not correspond to the profile's name and details.
That's what i think needs to take place, your profile shouldn't be activated automatically, someone should screen them first before activating them manually in the pool.
Because the quality of the applicants has increased.I would still like to know why the cutoff is the same even after increased number of ITA's, maybe if they can share the number of candidates between 460-480, we can get an idea.
No doubt, quality of applicant is increased. Still we can not deny the fact of declining ITAs every draw by CEC applicantsBecause the quality of the applicants has increased.
most likely with a job offer for most and others might select your profile for nomination. Aside these, you need to look out for PNP that suits your profileDoes anyone know how could I apply for provincial nomination? CRS 470 and can't afford to wait for more time as birthday is approaching. Thinking about how to get the 600 points
For example, I heard about Canadian immgration program only a couple months ago. I am aiming for CRS 480 but I haven't created my profile yet, since WES evaluation is still in progress. The day they finish the evaluation, I am going to create my profile and hopefully will be chosen in the very next draw.5300 people entered the pool in two weeks and 4000 of them were above 471, how come more number of people are not entering the pool below 470?
you have high chance to get golden ITA. Brace yourselfMy score got increased from 463 to 475 yesterday after my ielts results. What are the chances for getting ITA in next draw ? On what documents I can work at this point of time before ITA?
Making people pay, say $1, will not discourage anyone, but will dramatically decrease the number of fake profiles in the system.Imagine if CIC starts making people pay (as some suggested) to create an EE profile? This may discourage a lot of people and Canada will not reach its targeted numbers.