I am following PEI since last 2 years...but no avail. Also got this info through various forums. You can try your luck. No harm in thatare you claiming this on some basis or just guessing?
1. PNP inflow scores are 601 - 1200 and not 450 - 600. Before the draw on Jan 8th 2020 there were 567 people in the range of 601 - 1200, all of which got an invite on Jan 8th 2020. Thereafter during the subsequent draw held on Jan 22 2020, 778 people were in the range of 601 - 1200. This simply means that PNP inflow has increased and not ceased.Good news is 451-600 19,458 - only inreased by 1000 in 2 weeks. Meaning PNP inflow has ceased.
What you are missing is that invites are still at fixed numbers, so 601+ will be invited under this number, they go first, they take MOST of the draws for the past 3 months, hence growth in 551-600. Hope this is clear.1. PNP inflow scores are 601 - 1200 and not 450 - 600. Before the draw on Jan 8th 2020 there were 567 people in the range of 601 - 1200, all of which got an invite on Jan 8th 2020. Thereafter during the subsequent draw held on Jan 22 2020, 778 people were in the range of 601 - 1200. This simply means that PNP inflow has increased and not ceased.
2. 451 - 600 increased by 4069+ because 3400 of the previous 18789 were invited on Jan 8th 2020 after which 4069 got added to 18789-3400=15389 in two weeks. So currently 19458 of scores 451 - 600 are in the pool.
Please do not mislead people with wrong information.
E&OE
I don’t think I’m missing anything ... while the calculation I stated is approximate and close the actual numbers I’ve mentioned ‘E&OE’. My point was in clarifying that 4000+ has been added to the 450 - 600 range, and PNP inflow has not ceased, intact its gone up. Since a lot of people rely on information from this forum, kindly refrain from posting misleading or incorrect information.What you are missing is that invites are still at fixed numbers, so 601+ will be invited under this number, they go first, they take MOST of the draws for the past 3 months, hence growth in 551-600. Hope this is clear.
There are stats while you are making assumptions and you bluntly wrong in what you are saying, or may be just not understanding what is going on, while trying.I don’t think I’m missing anything ... while the calculation I stated is approximate and close the actual numbers I’ve mentioned ‘E&OE’. My point was in clarifying that 4000+ has been added to the 450 - 600 range, and PNP inflow has not ceased, intact its gone up. Since a lot of people rely on information from this forum, kindly refrain from posting misleading or incorrect information.
With all due respect, it seems you’re on a different tangent.There are stats while you are making assumptions and you bluntly wrong in what you are saying, or may be just not understanding what is going on, while trying.
PNP Applicants in October-December increased from 10% on average to 30% on average, of all reported applicants.
end of December and early January, we still had some SINP, OINP and AINP applicants nominated, hence % decreased, but still remained high at 20%. In Feb onward share of PNP will go down to an average 10% and will remain until July/August as per pattern for the past 2 years.
Additional info (although just repeating the above)
mate, i will conclude this conversation as i believe its obvious that you have no clue yourself what are you on about.With all due respect, it seems you’re on a different tangent.
Let me highlight what I meant was misleading in your post.
19Friday at 9:19 AM
Good news is 451-600 19,458 - only inreased by 1000 in 2 weeks. Meaning PNP inflow has ceased.
Incorrect information because 451 - 600 has not increased by 1000, rather its approximately 4000
PNP inflow has not ceased in anyway (neither by nominations) because your stats says it all, moreover 600+ in this round was higher than the previous one (nor by invitations)
Hope this information helps.
Why don’t you accept that you claimed to share some totally incorrect information which is so clear and has been corrected with the details shared by zee90999. Everyone makes mistakes, but if corrected you should accept your mistake and apologise instead of trying to prove your point in random ways.mate, i will conclude this conversation as i believe its obvious that you have no clue yourself what are you on about.
Gime some facts and numbers between the draws to prove the points? i did. Compare the numbers of pnp applicants, compare pool numbers, give us some facts.Why don’t you accept that you claimed to share some totally incorrect information which is so clear and has been corrected with the details shared by zee90999. Everyone makes mistakes, but if corrected you should accept your mistake and apologise instead of trying to prove your point in random ways.
Zee90999 is very clear in explaining how your post is misleading, and answer this question to yourself. Has 451 to 600 only increased by 1000 between 8th Jan to 22nd Jan draws? The answer is No
Has PNP inflow ceased? The answer is No
Is there any connection of applicants whose score is 451 to 600 with PNP? The answer is No
To conclude, your post was misleading and had no head no tail, and zee90999 has helped clarifying the same.
1. PNP inflow scores are 601 - 1200 and not 450 - 600. Before the draw on Jan 8th 2020 there were 567 people in the range of 601 - 1200, all of which got an invite on Jan 8th 2020. Thereafter during the subsequent draw held on Jan 22 2020, 778 people were in the range of 601 - 1200. This simply means that PNP inflow has increased and not ceased.
2. 451 - 600 increased by 4069+ because 3400 of the previous 18789 were invited on Jan 8th 2020 after which 4069 got added to 18789-3400=15389 in two weeks. So currently 19458 of scores 451 - 600 are in the pool.
Please do not mislead people with wrong information.
E&OE
FACTS AND NUMBERS WITH SIMPLE MATH ARE ALREADY IN THE ABOVE POST.Gime some facts and numbers between the draws to prove the points? i did. Compare the numbers of pnp applicants, compare pool numbers, give us some facts.
you both argue based on some assumed opinions which are wrong
dude, read your post again, i think i have asked numerous times. I guess you are not getting the point in your imaginative world of your broken logic.FACTS AND NUMBERS WITH SIMPLE MATH ARE ALREADY IN THE ABOVE POST.
Unless you have difficulty in understanding, please seek assistance from someone who can help you by explaining this.
I’m done breaking my head against the wall