. . . moved to Canada in 2004 when I was 4 years old with my family, we bought a house and . . . parents decided to move back later that year . . . sold the house and I have been living [outside Canada since] . . .
What are my options to move to Canada in 2021 or 2022?
. . . Is my case strong enough under humanitarian reasons as I was a minor when my family left Canada?
I agree with other observations to the extent they indicate there is a decent chance to keep PR status, which depends in large part on how soon you return to Canada to stay, BUT you are also at RISK for losing your PR status.
In particular you currently have a good chance of being allowed to keep PR status based on H&C reasons related to being removed as a minor, BUT
-- there are many factors considered in H&C cases, and given the brief period of residency and no presence in Canada for a decade and a half or so, which are both important factors as well, there is a RISK you will lose PR status
-- the SOONER you return to Canada to stay, the better chance you have of saving your status
I'd like to add that if it helps my case, I may be able to enter Canada in November 2019 (since I'm still 19 years old; birthday in March) for a month as my university summer holidays are from Nov-March.
It is very, very difficult to forecast how things will unfold for you.
If you come to Canada
TO STAY sooner, rather than later, that will be your best chance to save your PR status.
Any return to Canada, including a short visit, is likely to trigger (but NOT necessarily will trigger) Residency Obligation enforcement actions, starting with a RO examination and determination. The SOONER that happens, the better your chances (as a removed minor seeking to return to Canada reasonably soon after attaining the age of majority). BUT successfully saving your status is likely to depend on actually STAYING in Canada.
If you wait to come SOON, very SOON after you complete your studies, when you are 21 years old, you may still have a decent chance of being allowed to keep your PR status based on H&C reasons, primarily based on being removed as a minor and explaining the delay, after attaining the age of majority, on completing your course of studies. HOWEVER, the older you are, the WEAKER your H&C case is. Opinions here vary about the impact of staying abroad to complete studies, but NOT all opinions are created equal. That said, regarding this factor, staying abroad to complete studies in particular, opinions also vary in IAD decisions, some IAD panels giving this circumstance more positive weight than others, and some giving it negative weight based on it being a personal choice to remain outside Canada. There is very little doubt that the longer you wait to come to Canada to stay, the less chance you will have to keep PR status.
Since the PR condition is to live in Canada for 2 of 5 years, I may be able to fulfil this condition from Nov 2021-Nov 2023; i.e once I graduate and get my degree in Sydney, Australia
Do I need to stay in Canada for the first two years since I arrive in Canada if I go in Nov 2019? If I'm able to successfully enter Canada, I was planning to get my PR card renewed and go back to Australia to study/graduate and then go back to Canada in 2022 and stay permanently. That way I would still meet my 2/5 years obligation. Please let me know if any of this is incorrect.
The 2/5 rule is based on the PREVIOUS five years as of the DATE a Residency Obligation examination/determination is made. For example, apart from H&C relief, if you are issued a new PR card in March 2020, and you leave Canada, the next time you return to Canada a PoE officer can examine your compliance with the RO as of that date, and compliance will be based on whether you have met the 2/5 rule based on the five year time period prior to that day.
Thus, if you are issued a new PR card in March 2020, and you leave Canada, and you return to Canada November 3, 2021, your compliance with the RO will be based on whether you were present in Canada for at least 730 days between November 3, 2016 and November 3, 2021.
IF there is a positive decision giving a PR H&C relief from a breach of the RO, that changes the calculation SOME. To some extent it seems as if the positive H&C decision restarts the clock. BUT does not do so necessarily. The IAD decisions do not clearly demarcate the difference precisely. As best I can sort this out, it warrants remembering that if a PR has been outside Canada more than 1095 days in the previous five years (in Canada less than 730 days in that period), THAT IS A BREACH OF THE RO.
Thus, in effect, even if the PR has been given H&C relief and allowed to keep PR status, if a PR has been outside Canada more than 1095 days in the previous five years (in Canada less than 730 days in that period), THAT IS A BREACH OF THE RO. If, however, the circumstances have NOT materially changed, at least not by a lot, that H&C decision should still apply and the PR allowed to keep status. BUT, IN CONTRAST, if the PR only briefly stayed in Canada after the H&C decision, and then went abroad for an extended period of time, that alone could be considered a material change in circumstances justifying NOT allowing the PR to keep status the next time. There are IAD decisions upholding precisely these kinds of decisions.
If I apply and successfully get a PRTD, does it make a difference at the border if I drive through or fly into Canada?
Also, what does "get reported" mean?
"Reported" refers to the procedure at a PoE when a returning PR is examined as to RO compliance and the examining officer determines the PR is in breach of the RO. The PoE officer then issues a 44(1) Report for Inadmissibility based on a breach of the RO. The PR is then, or sometimes later but usually then, while still at the PoE, interviewed by another officer, who is designated the "Minister's Delegate" (but who is ordinarily just another officer), who decides whether to issue a Departure Order or set aside the 44(1) Report for H&C reasons. In either event the PR is allowed to enter Canada. If a Departure Order was issued, the PR has thirty days to appeal.
The advantage of applying for a PR Travel Document is that you can make the H&C case and if that is successful, and a PR TD is issued, you KNOW you have saved your PR status. No need to GAMBLE on saving PR status by coming and seeing how it goes at the border.
Moreover, if the PR TD is issued specifically on H&C grounds, the PR can safely apply for a new PR card soon after arriving in Canada (there is still some risk in this, but if the PR comes and settles PERMANENTLY, before making the PR card application, the risk should be quite small).
The disadvantages include:
-- most reporting (especially in the numbers of RO cases before the IAD) indicates that Visa Offices are more strict in enforcing the PR RO; that PoE officers tend to be more liberal if not outright generous in weighing H&C reasons (there are some likely reasons why this is so, addressed at length in other topics)
-- UNLESS the PR has been in Canada within the previous year, the PR will not be given a special TD to come to Canada pending an appeal (noting, though, that PRs who can travel via the U.S. can still come to Canada via the U.S.)
If you are issued a PR TD, the means of transportation does not matter. You can fly directly to Canada. Or come via the U.S. The PR TD gets you into Canada.
If you come to Canada without applying for a PR TD, coming via the U.S., you might or might not be "Reported" at the PoE. AND, even if you are Reported you might, or might not, be allowed to keep PR status based on H&C reasons.
If you are allowed to enter Canada without a formal H&C decision, you can CURE the RO breach by staying two years before leaving Canada and before applying for a new PR card. BUT if you need to know sooner, or you need to travel abroad sooner, you could apply for a new PR card based on H&C reasons and force a decision, one way or the other.
Overall there are many, many contingencies and possible variations in what can happen. You are in breach of the RO. So you are at RISK for losing PR status. You have a chance to keep your status. The sooner you come to Canada to stay, the better. Make no mistake, however, about the purpose of a grant of PR status, which includes allowing relief which enables a PR to keep status: it is so the individual CAN SETTLE IN CANADA PERMANENTLY. There is a tendency by more than a few to underestimate the importance of this when anticipating how IRCC or CBSA will handle their case.