understanding GCMS notes
- Thread starter yelena
- Start date
That's weird, here again ?
https://www.dropbox.com/s/6q74bgpgjptqm4a/Screen Shot 2019-10-21 at 9.39.26 AM.png?dl=0
https://www.dropbox.com/s/6q74bgpgjptqm4a/Screen Shot 2019-10-21 at 9.39.26 AM.png?dl=0
Hi.....please confirm when you ordered this note as I have been waiting 2months for mine.
Is there any additional comments on the notes. It's is not clear why your points have fallen.
Since 2017 there is an ongoing investigation in the IRCC, which was initiated by certain proceedings in the Federal Court of Canada. This investigation concern the fact that many Canadian Embassies during the period of 2014-2019 have used submitted applicants’ documents to transfer these documents to third persons who could not legally enter Canada otherwise. At the same time this applicant, the genuine owner of the documents, was sometimes denied visa, sometimes not. As the Embassies have falsified a lot of documents, since the beginning of the investigation IRCC has troubles identifying who is the genuine applicant, and who shall be provided which information. That’s what causes the delay in the processing of GCMS notes requests. If you think your documents might have been used to transfer them to third persons, make a request to Canada Border Services Agency, keeping it secret from other Canadian authorities. Many of you might be surprised that they are already in Canada for a long time now
, or that they entered and left Canada many more times than they actually did.But how the embassy or some people in the embassy can get information/documents on you if you let say never give applied for a visa before to Canada ?Since 2017 there is an ongoing investigation in the IRCC, which was initiated by certain proceedings in the Federal Court of Canada. This investigation concern the fact that many Canadian Embassies during the period of 2014-2019 have used submitted applicants’ documents to transfer these documents to third persons who could not legally enter Canada otherwise. At the same time this applicant, the genuine owner of the documents, was sometimes denied visa, sometimes not. As the Embassies have falsified a lot of documents, since the beginning of the investigation IRCC has troubles identifying who is the genuine applicant, and who shall be provided which information. That’s what causes the delay in the processing of GCMS notes requests. If you think your documents might have been used to transfer them to third persons, make a request to Canada Border Services Agency, keeping it secret from other Canadian authorities. Many of you might be surprised that they are already in Canada for a long time now
I might have understood this upside down but I don't get how this can be possible.
When you apply, let say, for a Skilled Worker program (Express Entry) you download all the copies of your documents. If your data is suitable to be used for other person (for instance, criminally inadmissible) in your country, and this person paid a bribe in the Embassy, you will get denied, and that person will enter Canada using your data. To put it simple, Embassy will stamp a visa into the exact copy of your passport, and that other person will enter Canada using it. Stealing of data happens at the time of your application, therefore, it does not matter if you applied earlier or not. I don’t say this happens all the time to everyone.
hi guys my AOR is 6th april 2019 and its been 206 days since I applied. My file moved to New delhi from Ottawa on 20th aug 2019 and the latest note which was made on 17/10/2019 and it says that-----
Text-Bulk Notes---this application is in queue for processing and email has been received related to this application. Please verify Economic folder under the PRU folder if no subsequent note is entered pertaining to email received.
so what exactly this means. almost all applications are approved from april and I guess only mine is still pending. does anyone can help if any one is in similar situation or were before and got ppr.
Text-Bulk Notes---this application is in queue for processing and email has been received related to this application. Please verify Economic folder under the PRU folder if no subsequent note is entered pertaining to email received.
so what exactly this means. almost all applications are approved from april and I guess only mine is still pending. does anyone can help if any one is in similar situation or were before and got ppr.
Just wondering does Case Analyst overwrite program assistant decision on the review required?
Program Assistant wrote a review required on pending Police Certificate in an earlier note
Case analyst then wrote Police Cert requested remain outstanding in next note and I don't see review required on his note anymore
Am I still under review required in this case? I already provided PCC before due date and no update so far on my file.
Program Assistant wrote a review required on pending Police Certificate in an earlier note
Case analyst then wrote Police Cert requested remain outstanding in next note and I don't see review required on his note anymore
Am I still under review required in this case? I already provided PCC before due date and no update so far on my file.
Hi - Can anybody please view my last section of GCMS notes and advise what it means? Below is the dropbox link. Thanks for the help!
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/5yprf1hc1djd7hm/AAC0b-mfLXyCv4tZNEtnflW7a?dl=0
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/5yprf1hc1djd7hm/AAC0b-mfLXyCv4tZNEtnflW7a?dl=0
Hello Every one,
please help me with this question,
i ordered the GCMS note and my wife is the primary applicant. i saw S.26 on some pages and pages is empty. also there is no information of dependant( me) on GCMS note. Do you know what s.26 means? is that something that should be concern?
Thank you for your response.
please help me with this question,
i ordered the GCMS note and my wife is the primary applicant. i saw S.26 on some pages and pages is empty. also there is no information of dependant( me) on GCMS note. Do you know what s.26 means? is that something that should be concern?
Thank you for your response.