No it wasn't the London VO. Even though the interview wasn't recorded the GCMS notes tell a lot about what happened with notes from my MP's office stating that the visa officer told us that he would get back to us in 2 days and the visa officer who made up the interview notes over 2 months later didn't put that in the notes at all. Also, it shows that the visa officer lied saying they were still waiting to get the document verified on November 9th when it shows that it was verfied on October 19th to be genuine. I have all the letters to my MP's office and copies of the webforms I sent in verifying what we said happened in the interview (which was all before we were refused, so why would we be making it up). We also have chats the day of the interview verifying questions asked and what happened at the interview. I know that people say that the prosecuter usually sides with the visa officers, but I think common sense would say that the interview notes being put in over 2 months after the interview and by a different visa officer should raise a question as to there may have been something wrong going on there.