Yep...Lets consider this week is our PPR day New hope arises every week.I have a feeling that today will be PPR day since its Tuesday As per there website, they will be having a system maintenance as well. I hope all of us can finally receive it.
what did the CSE say?I got a CSE response today. Generic as usual.
Does anyone know how much time is taken by Singapore HC to return the passports?AOR:13 Aug. ADR (PCC): 23 January, Indian residing in Myanmar
Guys,
Happy to share that my consultant has just forwarded our PPR. We have to submit our passports at VAC for stamping at Singapore HC.
Best wishes to every one awaiting PPR here.
Cheers...
Congrats ..CheersAOR:13 Aug. ADR (PCC): 23 January, Indian residing in Myanmar
Guys,
Happy to share that my consultant has just forwarded our PPR. We have to submit our passports at VAC for stamping at Singapore HC.
Best wishes to every one awaiting PPR here.
Cheers...
less than 3 weeks.Does anyone know how much time is taken by Singapore HC to return the passports?
Can i please know how one could tell if he's under SS from the GCMS notes?Ohh... sorry @Pris
I don't really know much about SS reading but I know that the activities under security are usually erased (redacted) or blank.Can i please know how one could tell if he's under SS from the GCMS notes?
Also, what do you mean by "Retracted from the 5th"
Appreciated thanks
For my husband (who is the one under SS), in Activity 1 to 4 (pages 101 in my case), fields "created date:", "create by:", "updated name" and "updated by" are empty, then UCI number and Name are filled, thats it (no activity type, status or subsequent fields). Same for Activity 5 except that there is a field "Activity type: Security". Also S.15 (1) is annoted on the top right corner of those pagesCan i please know how one could tell if he's under SS from the GCMS notes?
Also, what do you mean by "Retracted from the 5th"
Appreciated thanks
If there was no consent form for your spouse, their details will not be included in your notes. Ours was the same - I'm the PA and there was no consent form for him, so lots of dedacted info/pages under s (15). I doubt it's actually SS. It might be worth applying for notes for your husband to get a better understanding.For my husband (who is the one under SS), in Activity 1 to 4 (pages 101 in my case), fields "created date:", "create by:", "updated name" and "updated by" are empty, then UCI number and Name are filled, thats it (no activity type, status or subsequent fields). Same for Activity 5 except that there is a field "Activity type: Security". Also S.15 (1) is annoted on the top right corner of those pages
Also, in the first pages of the documents where it states Eligibility, Criminality and Security status, my husband status are met/passed for eligibility and criminality while security status is blank with also s15 (1) on the top right corner. My security is "not started", meaning that I am not under SS while my husband is.
I hope you can understand what I am trying to detail
Thanks for your interest but I regret the CSE was nothing new or informative.what did the CSE say?
Oh I see. Well in my case security is ongoing since mid December according to three agents I called since then so guess its SS anyway.If there was no consent form for your spouse, their details will not be included in your notes. Ours was the same - I'm the PA and there was no consent form for him, so lots of dedacted info/pages under s (15). I doubt it's actually SS. It might be worth applying for notes for your husband to get a better understanding.