Hi CANSHA and hope and faith,
Kindly evaluate this essay as per your convenience.
Thanks.
Essay – Some people argue higher taxes should be collected from industries causing higher industrial pollution whereas others argue there are better ways to deal it . Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Carbon emissions and toxic byproducts from industries are increasingly proving to be a threat for the fauna and flora of the planet. While some people debate that imposing heavy taxes on industries can be an effective solution for this problem, others opine that superior alternatives are available to curb this menace. From my perspective, adoption of better mechanics in terms of suitable raw material and dealing with the violators of the established norms strictly can be a way out.
Collection of exorbitant taxes from the major sources of industrial wastes is conceived to be a potent way to deal with these problems. It is believed that adopting such a measure would coerce these factories to reduce the harmful waste products and adopt other means to safeguard the environment. Further, it is argued that the revenue collected from such sources of environmental pollution can be utilized by government agencies to provide funding to various government initiatives to protect the environment. Environmental ministry of France, to illustrate, adopted this policy in the year 2015 and according to their survey they have been able to reduce Industrial toxins by 35% in last three years.
Others, however, argue that imposing higher taxes would negatively affect the industries that are already paying taxes on their turnover. According to them, government should run awareness programs to sensitize this sector to adopt methods which are eco-friendly. Further , providing subsidies to industries is a more feasible alternative to encourage them to utilize bio-degradable raw material to substantially curb environmental pollutants. For instance, a pilot project in Uttrakhand was carried out to use eco-friendly raw materials in paint industries. The results were encouraging as the quantity of its toxic byproducts considerably reduced in adjoining river Ganga.
In conclusion, from my perspective, laying regulatory norms for industries to control pollution and providing them superior raw materials and mechanisms for their operation is an ideal way. However, if industries fail to adhere to these established norms, heavy fines should be imposed on them as a penalty.
Kindly evaluate this essay as per your convenience.
Thanks.
Essay – Some people argue higher taxes should be collected from industries causing higher industrial pollution whereas others argue there are better ways to deal it . Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Carbon emissions and toxic byproducts from industries are increasingly proving to be a threat for the fauna and flora of the planet. While some people debate that imposing heavy taxes on industries can be an effective solution for this problem, others opine that superior alternatives are available to curb this menace. From my perspective, adoption of better mechanics in terms of suitable raw material and dealing with the violators of the established norms strictly can be a way out.
Collection of exorbitant taxes from the major sources of industrial wastes is conceived to be a potent way to deal with these problems. It is believed that adopting such a measure would coerce these factories to reduce the harmful waste products and adopt other means to safeguard the environment. Further, it is argued that the revenue collected from such sources of environmental pollution can be utilized by government agencies to provide funding to various government initiatives to protect the environment. Environmental ministry of France, to illustrate, adopted this policy in the year 2015 and according to their survey they have been able to reduce Industrial toxins by 35% in last three years.
Others, however, argue that imposing higher taxes would negatively affect the industries that are already paying taxes on their turnover. According to them, government should run awareness programs to sensitize this sector to adopt methods which are eco-friendly. Further , providing subsidies to industries is a more feasible alternative to encourage them to utilize bio-degradable raw material to substantially curb environmental pollutants. For instance, a pilot project in Uttrakhand was carried out to use eco-friendly raw materials in paint industries. The results were encouraging as the quantity of its toxic byproducts considerably reduced in adjoining river Ganga.
In conclusion, from my perspective, laying regulatory norms for industries to control pollution and providing them superior raw materials and mechanisms for their operation is an ideal way. However, if industries fail to adhere to these established norms, heavy fines should be imposed on them as a penalty.
Last edited: