Ha ha yeah. Could be neighbours in Canada as well.Great, we are neighbours then.
Cheers.
Regards.
Yes why not.Ha ha yeah. Could Ben neighbours in Canada as well.
I will be very thankful if someone can review my essay and suggest the areas for improvement. Thanks in advance.
Prompt:
In many countries, the amount of crime is increasing.
What do you think are the main causes of crime?
How can we deal with those causes?
Essay:
The good - Okay so English wise nothing wrong in the paragraph. You don't really have any grammar issues also.In the last decade, crime is rising at an alarming rate in most of the countries. People are getting insensitive towards the lives of others. There are couple of reason for this situation. In this essay we will discuss the causes for increase in crime as well as the ways to address it.
The Good - You have good vocab. Highlighted in green. You have many ideas on the topic. Highlighted in bold.The Most important reason for increase in crime rate is lack of education. Do not begin the sentence with Most. The correct English is The most. Yes we do write it the way you have written here. But remember this is a formal essay writing task. Hence, you need to use proper language.
If we analyse the statistics, we will find that crime is very high in the countries with lower level of education.
Since, due to lack of education the people get influenced by the anti-social elements very easily.
Moreover, lack of education also creates fever employment opportunities.
Higher unemployment rate also lead to higher crime rate.
Poverty is another cause of increase in crime. Most of the countries with lower per capita income leads lead in the crime tally. Poor people indulge into in criminal activities to get easy money.
Moreover, lack of adequate laws and regulation also create a very conducive environment for the criminals.
The good -> Good use of not only but also. Good complex sentence. Also, you tried to follow the same order in solution as in the problem para above. Good. Well done!In order to address the situation, government need needs to take an initiative by creating awareness amongst the public that crime not only impacts the country badly but also has negative implication on them as well as on their families. Literacy level should be increased through various means like free education, scholarship for intelligent children etc. Simultaneously,(missing comma) government should make efforts to create adequate employment opportunities. Last but not the least is to create laws with proper implementation to control the crime. Since in some situations, stick is required to control it.
Okay conclusion.To conclude I feel illiteracy, unemployment, lack of strict laws are the main reasons for increase in crime rate. Poverty is not?
This can be addressed by following a balanced approach. Government should create adequate employment, education, awareness as well as stringent rules and regulation to control it.
Doctor sahib, thank you so much for the quote, I am also clinging to it in some other way than IELTS itself.Dear Hope and Faith,
I got a real good qoute for you.
Remember that sometimes not getting what you want is a wonderful stroke of Luck. (Dalai Lama)
Your journey with Ielts is about to end.
Your result will surely see you getting CLB 9 this time around.
Just forget about Ielts now and start preparing to submit your application for PR in Canada.
Go and get your documents ready for submission. Forget everything else.
You will cross the line of Ielts this time.
That is what I hope and pray for you.
We will celebrate your success here.
So for now just chill and dont get frustrate. Success is around the corner now.
It might happen that you may get PR in just a month after filing your application.
So stay positive and hopeful.
Regards.
Dr. Bilal
Appreciate your effort in reviewing my essay and providing valuable inputs...surely, I will try to address them in my next writings...Thanks alot.The good - Okay so English wise nothing wrong in the paragraph. You don't really have any grammar issues also.
What could be better ? The introduction is a little weak. There is nothing new in the intro paragraph and it doesn't give me any preview of what to expect. Sentence 3 and 4 add no value whatsoever to the essay.
Another minor thing ... You say a couple of things ... Then you give three reasons in your paragraph following it. Is it a big deal? I'm not sure but why take a chance and use kind of informal language in your essay.
The Good - You have good vocab. Highlighted in green. You have many ideas on the topic. Highlighted in bold.
Could be better - There are a few grammatical mistakes which I have highlighted.
And buddy having ideas is a good thing. BUT my friend you have messed it up. You said in the intro "couple of reasons" then in this paragraph you have introduced 4 ideas. And apart from Education you have not done justice to remaining ones. Why not stick with just two/three and do them justice.
This is where you lose marks for coherence and cohesion. See I had to read through and break your para line by line to highlight that you made 4 different points. Many websites / tutors suggest to use Firstly, Secondly ... etc... to show cohesion. It may be cliche but atleast it is better than having nothing at all.
On coherence, you are jumping from one idea to another. See I understand what you are trying to say. BUT remember this is a formal writing task ... do not assume what you're thinking is obvious to the examiner.
The good -> Good use of not only but also. Good complex sentence. Also, you tried to follow the same order in solution as in the problem para above. Good. Well done!
What could be better -> Last sentence is just hanging there. It could have been phrased better. The first argument of awareness basically doesn't tie to your problem paragraph. The argument from literacy onward ties to your argument of lack of education. The last but not least sentence is phrased wrongly. Who needs to implement the laws? The subject is missing. If it is supposed to be subject less then a noun is missing.
Example,
Last but not the least (I would rather just use Lastly), Government needs to create laws
or
Last but not the least (Lastly,) there is a need to create laws ....
Okay conclusion.
You are most welcome hope and faith.Doctor sahib, thank you so much for the quote, I am also clinging to it in some other way than IELTS itself.
Let's just pray together, God will surely bless us with good fortune....
Dear Friends, I tried to practice on the topic of Task - 2 from the September 15th IELTS test. I would highly obliged, if someone can review my essay and highlight the areas of improvement.
Prompt:
As countries develop, more and more people buy their cars. Do the advantages for individuals outweigh the disadvantages for the environment?
Essay:
The good -> No problem in English barring a few spelling errors. Mostly simple sentences though.Pollution is becoming a severe problem for most of the countries. It is a responsibility of all of us to preserve the environment. Transportation is a major contributor for this concern. We should encourage people to use public transport rather than private car. This will definately wrong spelling help us to serve our environment to some extend extent.
Okay there are quite a few grammar errors. You really need to review the use of Articles A, An, The. Also, wrong verb form for people multiple times. Missing comma once again after However. This had pointed out in previous review as well. What is the point of a review if you will repeat same small mistakes again.We have noticed a trend that as the economy of the a country grow grows,thepeople tends tend to buy their private vehicle. There are multiple reasons for such phenomena. As the income level grows, people buys buy car for their comfort. Moreover, (missing comma) another reason is that the government fail to maintain the pace of economic growth to the development of public transport system. This approach of government and insensitiveness of the public towards the environment is creating a lot of problems like global warming, health problems etc, for all of us. We cannot compromise with the entire society, because of the negligence of few.
This para again is off topic. There are spelling errors too.We should focus on addressing this problem on the priority basis. The government should create awareness amongst the public towards the environment. Moreover, a concrete plan need to be developed to have an adequate public transport system, available to public. The transport system should be economical and comfortable. So that, the public is left with no excuse to uase their personal cars.
You really need to focus on task response. Please read the question again. What is more painful is that @H0peAndFa1th has reviewed many essays in previous pages and explained this at least more than 20 times. Please do read the previous pages and reviews. You are repeating same errors as others.To conclude, the usage of private cars are inversely impacting all of us in much greater way than helping a small group of people. The situation need to be addressed on an urgent basis.
Save Environment, Save World !!
The good -> No problem in English barring a few spelling errors. Mostly simple sentences though.
What could be better -> I'm afraid I think the whole introduction could be better. You completely missed to hit the the topic in introduction. Okay ... linking Environment with pollution is okay. But read the question once again. Do you think you have addressed it?
Okay there are quite a few grammar errors. You really need to review the use of Articles A, An, The. Also, wrong verb form for people multiple times. Missing comma once again after However. This had pointed out in previous review as well. What is the point of a review if you will repeat same small mistakes again.
So that was the English part. Let's come to the content part. I'm afraid this is so far from the topic. The question is whether advantages of an individual car outweigh disadvantages to Environment. Have you addressed advantages of owning a private vehicle?
This para again is off topic. There are spelling errors too.
Thanks for your review comments. Will look into the error and try to improve it next time...
You really need to focus on task response. Please read the question again. What is more painful is that @H0peAndFa1th has reviewed many essays in previous pages and explained this at least more than 20 times. Please do read the previous pages and reviews. You are repeating same errors as others.
Thanks alot for your feedback comments..I will definitely try to improve on these areas next time...The good -> No problem in English barring a few spelling errors. Mostly simple sentences though.
What could be better -> I'm afraid I think the whole introduction could be better. You completely missed to hit the the topic in introduction. Okay ... linking Environment with pollution is okay. But read the question once again. Do you think you have addressed it?
Okay there are quite a few grammar errors. You really need to review the use of Articles A, An, The. Also, wrong verb form for people multiple times. Missing comma once again after However. This had pointed out in previous review as well. What is the point of a review if you will repeat same small mistakes again.
So that was the English part. Let's come to the content part. I'm afraid this is so far from the topic. The question is whether advantages of an individual car outweigh disadvantages to Environment. Have you addressed advantages of owning a private vehicle?
This para again is off topic. There are spelling errors too.
You really need to focus on task response. Please read the question again. What is more painful is that @H0peAndFa1th has reviewed many essays in previous pages and explained this at least more than 20 times. Please do read the previous pages and reviews. You are repeating same errors as others.