- Jan 24, 2018
- 3
- Category........
- PNP
- Visa Office......
- Ottawa
- NOC Code......
- 1122
- App. Filed.......
- 13-08-2017
- Doc's Request.
- 25-10-2017
- Nomination.....
- 31-05-2017
- AOR Received.
- 14-08-2017
- Med's Done....
- 27-09-2017
- Passport Req..
- 08-02-2018
- VISA ISSUED...
- 14-02-2018
Hey Guys,
I am wondering if anyone has insight on this. My GCMS notes detail that my application is now stuck in review required and there are comments that are causing me concern, and am wondering if anyone has been in a similar boat and/or if I should pre-empt and add the documents mentioned.
I am wondering if anyone has insight on this. My GCMS notes detail that my application is now stuck in review required and there are comments that are causing me concern, and am wondering if anyone has been in a similar boat and/or if I should pre-empt and add the documents mentioned.
REVIEW TYPE: Case Analyst APPLICATION: EXXX Regulation PNP: FSW, 2017-08-14 I have verified this application under Section 11.2 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA) and make the following determination. RECOMMENDATION: ***Review REQUIRED by Officer*** A11.2: APPEARS MET Ready to Finalize __
CIVIL STATUS: PA (XX), SINGLE __ INTEGRATED SEARCH (FOSS/GCMS): PA: XX NO ADVERSE INFORMMATION
A11.2 CRS ASSESSMENT: APPEARS MET CRS Score at ITA: 1003 / Min CRS Score for Round: 199 Total CRS Points Assessed: 978 PA gained points as SINGLE at ITA and APR *** 600 - PROVINCIAL NOMINATION - Verified by CIO***
__ WORK EXPERIENCE(S): Qualifying Period: from 14Aug2007 to 13Aug2017 1) Product Manager - (NOC1122) 2015/11 to ongoing at XX. LOE Salary $: $95,000. Submitted letter(s) of reference 2015-09-23 which is/are assessed as follows: EDOCS NUMBERS: XX.
The duties listed in the letter(s) of reference DID NOT appear to be consistent with the actions in the lead statement under the NOC code selected. The letter(s) of reference DID NOT appear to be consisted with a substantial number of the main duties under the NOC code selected. The letter(s) of reference appear to demonstrate that the PA met the minimum requirements of 12 months of work experience. ADDITIONAL NOTES: **NO LOE & list of duties, appears only job offer provided** **No paystubs or income tax documents provided.** PA meets education requirements
P.S. I provided paystubs when applying for PNP. Is there a high probability of my application being rejected?CIVIL STATUS: PA (XX), SINGLE __ INTEGRATED SEARCH (FOSS/GCMS): PA: XX NO ADVERSE INFORMMATION
A11.2 CRS ASSESSMENT: APPEARS MET CRS Score at ITA: 1003 / Min CRS Score for Round: 199 Total CRS Points Assessed: 978 PA gained points as SINGLE at ITA and APR *** 600 - PROVINCIAL NOMINATION - Verified by CIO***
__ WORK EXPERIENCE(S): Qualifying Period: from 14Aug2007 to 13Aug2017 1) Product Manager - (NOC1122) 2015/11 to ongoing at XX. LOE Salary $: $95,000. Submitted letter(s) of reference 2015-09-23 which is/are assessed as follows: EDOCS NUMBERS: XX.
The duties listed in the letter(s) of reference DID NOT appear to be consistent with the actions in the lead statement under the NOC code selected. The letter(s) of reference DID NOT appear to be consisted with a substantial number of the main duties under the NOC code selected. The letter(s) of reference appear to demonstrate that the PA met the minimum requirements of 12 months of work experience. ADDITIONAL NOTES: **NO LOE & list of duties, appears only job offer provided** **No paystubs or income tax documents provided.** PA meets education requirements