Bill C-6: Senate stage

[spyfy]

I'm afraid you misunderstood my post. They already have this "flexibility" - the current wording just ensures that the implementation takes less than one year (i.e., they have 1-365 days to implement). The proposed change removes this, which means that, in theory, they can take more than one year to implement.

It is simply unusual for a law to set a deadline for royal assent. When the amendment was proposed by the Senate they set such a deadline. The deadline would have applied only to that provision, not to the others. Obviously, the government doesn't want to set a precedent where parliament sets deadlines to when governor-in-council orders are proclaimed. That's why the removed that line. It does not imply that they intend to wait more than a year.

 

[pkin007]

so what are they starting off with today?

 

[spyfy]

I thought c-6 was not on the agenda for today? can anybody explain?
https://www.parl.ca/LegisInfo/Agenda.aspx?Language=E

Thank you

Please, can people start reading the previous posts before asking the same question every ten minutes? Just go back one page.

 

[AliChraim]

Senator Jaffer said C6 will be discussed today, but she's not sure if the vote will happen today.

 

[energym]

So we will jump to the new thread...hahah

We'll have two new threads one "C-6 implementation ... FACT ONLY" by spyfy with the occasional remainder that is facts only, and one "C-6 implementation stage Hopes and despairs - dreams and cotton candy" full of the usual pessimism, optimism, and in-between.

 

[Tornado_75]

Let us wait what the conservatives maniacs will do today.... what their plans to delay and hinder

 

[pkin007]

they are starting with C16

 

[stalintouch]

We'll have two new threads one "C-6 implementation ... FACT ONLY" by spyfy with the occasional remainder that is facts only, and one "C-6 implementation stage Hopes and despairs - dreams and cotton candy" full of the usual pessimism, optimism, and in-between.

haha well said

 

[sistemc]

Senate skipped C-6 today, and proceed with 3rd reading of the C-16.

So much about validity of tweeting. Have a nice day.

 

[Andy76]

Senate skipped C-6 today, and proceed with 3rd reading of the C-16.

So much about validity of tweeting. Have a nice day.

So it will not be discussed today also??!!

 

[pkin007]

So it will not be discussed today also??!!

we can't be sure that C16 will be discussed till 5:30PM..my thought they will initiate a discussion on C6 in the dying minutes of the day

 

[MarceauBletard]

https://twitter.com/SenJaffer/status/875414769766998017

Sen. Mobina Jaffer‏ Verified account @SenJaffer 16 minutes ago
Replying to @AadrishmBaloch @Yellownotez
#C6 we will debate today and there might even be a vote. MIght #C6 #senCA

 

[pkin007]

again IMHO

 

[spiritsoul]

what kind of marriage was declared by the breast? I would like to attend the wedding ...

Hhhhhh I'd attend the one declared by the *** ..... it was a typo:

Priest

 

[civilengr]

We'll have two new threads one "C-6 implementation ... FACT ONLY" by spyfy with the occasional remainder that is facts only, and one "C-6 implementation stage Hopes and despairs - dreams and cotton candy" full of the usual pessimism, optimism, and in-between.

I logged in just to give you a thumbs up