The HoC will not simply accept the amendments, see the suggested motion in the order paper which is a government sponsored motion and therefore will be voted through by the house majority.
Bill C-6: Senate stage
- Thread starter marcher
- Start date
Lol man. It depends on individuals. For me, I hope it applies ASAP. It is all about luck so accept it and I will accept mine.
99% of the life is based on luck which is defined differently by religions and science. Only 1% depends on you and the rest is on the luck. So stay happy
Thank you my friend! I am 100% sure it will indeed be law by end of June and i wish for all of us we would be able to apply by July!
Then who knows this forum become abt our timelines <3
Last edited:
maran1976
Hero Member
- Feb 22, 2010
- 37
- Category........
- Visa Office......
- New Delhi
- NOC Code......
- 0111
- Job Offer........
- Pre-Assessed..
- App. Filed.......
- 14 April 2010
- AOR Received.
- 26 Nov 2010 (2nd Aor Date)
- Med's Request
- 28-02-2013
- Med's Done....
- 6th March 2013
- Interview........
- hopefully waived
- Passport Req..
- Recvd by CHC Mar 13th
Time to start gathering supporting documents and draft filling the forms ....
Statement by the minister regarding the amendments to bill C-6. He is basically accepting the due process and minors amendment, rejecting the 60 yo one and rejecting a clause in the due process amendment that would allow fraudulent people to retain their Permanent Residency.
https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/news/2017/06/statement_by_ministerhussenonadvancingbillc-6anacttoamendtheciti.html
https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/news/2017/06/statement_by_ministerhussenonadvancingbillc-6anacttoamendtheciti.html
it's the weekend, relax bro am gonna be on crescent street 2night , ur welcome to have a beer with me maybe u need to chill a bit :d
sbag_in
Hero Member
- Jul 15, 2014
- 37
- Category........
- Visa Office......
- NEW DELHI
- Job Offer........
- Pre-Assessed..
- App. Filed.......
- 31-MARCH, 2014
- Doc's Request.
- NONE
- AOR Received.
- 14-MAY(aor1) / 31-JUL(aor2)
- File Transfer...
- 15-JULY, 2014, IP- OCT-30
- Med's Request
- UPFRONT
- Med's Done....
- 29-JAN, 2014
- Interview........
- NONE
- Passport Req..
- and D.M. on NOV-3, 2014
- VISA ISSUED...
- received on : 10TH NOV, 2014
- LANDED..........
- Jan -18, 2015
Basically this says the only issue would be the age bracket for the language exam and giving the minister the authority to make decisions when an individual requests it.
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/liberals-citizenship-bill-to-proceed-with-some-senate-amendments/article35278832/
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/liberals-citizenship-bill-to-proceed-with-some-senate-amendments/article35278832/
Well done Redfield.
So what does this mean
“The Government is also rejecting the amendment that would have all individuals who committed fraud retain permanent resident status as an outcome, regardless of what stage in the citizenship process the fraud was committed at, thereby not rewarding the fraud with status that should not have been received in the first place.” I do not recall that was even an amendment in the first place!
Honestly, I am very glad the government did not reject the minor clause because conservatives would be very upset.
I am even more optimistic now that the bill will pass very easily in the senate.
So what does this mean
“The Government is also rejecting the amendment that would have all individuals who committed fraud retain permanent resident status as an outcome, regardless of what stage in the citizenship process the fraud was committed at, thereby not rewarding the fraud with status that should not have been received in the first place.” I do not recall that was even an amendment in the first place!
Honestly, I am very glad the government did not reject the minor clause because conservatives would be very upset.
I am even more optimistic now that the bill will pass very easily in the senate.
That clause was part of Senator Omidvars amendment regarding due process. I wouldn't be surprised if this outcome wasn't even intended by the original author of the amendment (because if a court decided that you misrepresented yourself in a PR application as part of a citizenship review, of course you should lose PR), there was also no mention of this particular possibility. But the amendment was drafted over a very small number of days with minimal legal support. So it might just be that they didn't notice that the combination of clause soandso in combination with clause soandso would provide that outcome. Once the bill was back at the commons, all of the Minister's legal counsel, which is obviously larger, had a look at the amendment and noticed that "loophole" and now they want to correct it.
I really can't think of a reason why they would've wanted this exact regulation.
Don't worry, he'll likely get banned again, is a sockpuppet of another account who is angry at Canada, moved to the US, yet wants to apply for Canadian citizenship, doesn't meet residency requirements, thus trolls and throws tantrums. I'd say block but given his posting style he's likely to get banned again anyways.
One simple question pls
Can the senates add more amendments to the bill once goes back to them , or they only committed to accept or reject or modify the 1 amendment which HOC going to reject ?
Because if they can propose new amendments with different subjects once goes back to them ( senates ) I think it will be a never end loop , back and forth ..... and keep waiting for ever ....
Can the senates add more amendments to the bill once goes back to them , or they only committed to accept or reject or modify the 1 amendment which HOC going to reject ?
Because if they can propose new amendments with different subjects once goes back to them ( senates ) I think it will be a never end loop , back and forth ..... and keep waiting for ever ....
Last edited: