I didn't make any of those 100 predictions, stop pinning other people's nonsense to me.
I didn't. My post doesn't refer to you in any way. It wasn't even following your post. So how could I "pin other people's nonsense to you". That is ridiculous. I didn't even name you in the post, how could I then insinuate that you voiced a particular opinion. I was addressing the general atmosphere of yay and nay sayers.
Your attitude as to the timeline of this bill has been nothing but bizarre. What you're saying is akin to looking at a cloudy sky and screaming "no one knows for sure if it's going to rain!! Only a fool could say that for sure!"
No, what I'm saying is "No one on here, myself included, is a meteorologist. Therefore no one on here is qualified to make rain predictions. Also the analogy is pretty slim. You have decades of experience with the weather. I prudently assume that you don't have decades of experience with parliamentary procedure in the HoC of Canada (me neither by the way).
Yes, of course no one knows for sure if this bill will pass, and I never claimed that it won't with complete certainty. I simply referred to the fact they only two weeks remain (of which the senate sits only six days) during this session, that there are MANY bills on the docket, that C6 face what resistance in the senate, and therefore, it is unlikely that it will pass with the short time that is left. I am entitled to having that opinion and I am freely expressing it.
Yup you are entitled to having that opinion and I am entitled to having the opinion that your opinion/prediction doesn't matter since you don't have enough experience to make a reliable prediction. I furthermore am of the opinion that I myself don't have enough experience to make a reliable prediction.
It is also factually wrong that the Senate "sits only 6 days". The Senate sits one week after the HoC. So there is nine days remaining. This is assuming that the Senate doesn't add optional sitting days on Monday or Friday (like they did this Monday by the way).
You will probably still be telling people on the 23rd that "nobody can be sure if this bill will pass!", calling everyone who suggests that not enough time exists a fool who doesn't understand Ottawa politics.
What I regularly do is pointing out that there still is a possible path for this bill to become law before the break. I am not saying it is or isn't probable, since, again, I am not qualified to make that call. And unless there are Members of Parliament or Senators hiding behind the forum usernames (which would be hilarious, now that I think about it), everyone else isn't qualified to make that call either.
When it comes to showing that there is a possibility (not a probability!) for this bill to pass, I add links to the order paper, links to the parliamentary rulebooks, screenshots from legisinfo. Other people, particularly the naysayers, have nothing but "politicians are lazy and don't care and I know that and I know that it won't pass" without any external link to substantiate any of these claims.
But again, I am NOT claiming that the bill is passing by the end of June. I'm only saying that there is a possibility and I'm saying that no one on here is qualified to make a reliable prediction.
Meanwhile I would not say on the 23rd what you are putting into my mouth. Because if the bill won't have been debated by June 23rd, there would in fact not even be a possible way for this bill to pass.
I cannot emphasize enough that I am pointing out
possible paths, based on parliamentary procedure, but that I am
not claiming probabilities.
Fair enough...that's you're attitude, that's fine. I never attacked you for it and I ask that you reciprocate and respect mine.
Again I don't know how you construed that I attacked you in particular. I was, again, addressing the general forum atmosphere.