Hi
@Miss bee - I received my GCMS notes today, and the summary from 24th October indicates the following:
Outstanding:
Eligibility: review required
Criminality x PA and spouse
Security x PA and spouse Ready for CO review
**********
CPO to review Schedule A (section 6)
CPO to review Info sharing
Ready for CPO review
It is currently marked as ready for CPO review, and I haven’t had any updates since then. My PVO is Etobicoke. I previously had a Study Permit refusal and also obtained my PGWP through flagpoling. In the Statutory Questions (IMM5669), I answered "Yes" for the question on previous refusals but "No" for previous denial of entry (as I misunderstood the wording). However, I did provide an explanation for both in the description section. Could this be a concern, and if so, what should I expect next?
The notes from your GCMS suggest that your file is currently awaiting a Centralized Processing Officer (CPO) review, which is common when additional scrutiny is needed for certain elements of your application. Here’s a breakdown:
1. Eligibility Review Required: This indicates that an officer flagged some aspect of your eligibility for further review. This could be due to the previous study permit refusal or other factors related to your work experience, education, or other supporting documents.
2. Criminality and Security Checks Ready for Review: These checks have likely been completed and are awaiting the CPO’s final assessment.
3. Schedule A (IMM5669) Issue: The fact that you answered “No” to the denial of entry question, despite flagpoling, may have triggered the review. However, since you provided an explanation in the description section, this could work in your favor. Officers understand that applicants can sometimes misinterpret the questions, and your transparency in the additional information section helps clarify your intent.
4. Etobicoke Visa Office (PVO): This office often handles more complex cases or those requiring additional scrutiny, which could explain the longer processing time.
What to expect next:
• The CPO will review your eligibility and the Schedule A form.
• If they require additional documents or clarification, they may issue a procedural fairness letter (PFL). However, this is not guaranteed and depends on the severity of the concern.
• If everything is satisfactory, your eligibility will be marked as “Passed,” and the application will proceed to the final decision stage.
Recommendations:
• Order updated GCMS notes in about 1-2 months to track progress.
• Consider a webform submission to explain the misunderstanding and provide supporting documents or clarifications.
• If you haven’t already, consult with an immigration consultant or lawyer, especially if you feel the previous refusal could impact the outcome.