My brother applied for a visitor visa (45 days) with his wife & daughter. My brother runs a business in Delhi, wife is a grade 12th maths teacher, daughter in grade 8. We got all the documents (sufficient funds, FDs, investment property, leave letter from both schools stating dates of travel, pay stubs, ITRs, invitation letter, our funds etc) They don't have travel history to US, UK etc, no previous Canadian visa. They got rejected stating this:
I am not satisfied that you will leave Canada at the end of your stay as required by paragraph 179(b) of the IRPR (https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/regulations/SOR-2002-227/section-179.html). I am refusing your application because you have not established that you will leave Canada, based on the following factors:
• The purpose of your visit to Canada is not consistent with a temporary stay given the details you have provided in your application.
• Your assets and financial situation are insufficient to support the stated purpose of travel for yourself (and any accompanying family member(s), if applicable).
I believe it's a generic reply. Anything else we can do to reconsider? Does explaining with a letter help?
I am not satisfied that you will leave Canada at the end of your stay as required by paragraph 179(b) of the IRPR (https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/regulations/SOR-2002-227/section-179.html). I am refusing your application because you have not established that you will leave Canada, based on the following factors:
• The purpose of your visit to Canada is not consistent with a temporary stay given the details you have provided in your application.
• Your assets and financial situation are insufficient to support the stated purpose of travel for yourself (and any accompanying family member(s), if applicable).
I believe it's a generic reply. Anything else we can do to reconsider? Does explaining with a letter help?
