FSW WORLDWIDE

[Deleted member 1006777]

why not work at becoming inland

I'm tired of this, but to answer this question (again), I don't think Canada is worth paying 100k to get into. French allows you to be LMIA exempt, but I got interviews and they outright told me that right now they're only considering people on PGWPs. I don't think Canadian education is worth anything close to 100k or whatever they charge for tuition.

That's why I don't care about being inland. If I get an ITA with my CRS, fine. If not, I've already moved on from Canada. I still value their passport, and that's all I care about if I do end up going to Canada.

Inland is easier, but to me, the price (in terms of dollars as well as time) is not worth it.

 

[Deleted member 1006777]

why not quebec ?

An intent to live outside Quebec is a prerequisite to apply for PR. Go read the requirements on the website.

 

[seadrag0n]

why not quebec ?

Because Quebec is both part of Canada and not at the same time.

 

[SatNight]

I'm tired of this, but to answer this question (again), I don't think Canada is worth paying 100k to get into. French allows you to be LMIA exempt, but I got interviews and they outright told me that right now they're only considering people on PGWPs. I don't think Canadian education is worth anything close to 100k or whatever they charge for tuition.

That's why I don't care about being inland. If I get an ITA with my CRS, fine. If not, I've already moved on from Canada. I still value their passport, and that's all I care about if I do end up going to Canada.

Inland is easier, but to me, the price (in terms of dollars as well as time) is not worth it.

Fair enough, and indeed, those are good reasons. We wouldn't be able to become inland if money was required - the good thing is that PhD programs are funded so you don't pay anything. But it is 4+ years of life. Not a quick way at all.

 

[Deleted member 1006777]

Fair enough, and indeed, those are good reasons. We wouldn't be able to become inland if money was required - the good thing is that PhD programs are funded so you don't pay anything. But it is 4+ years of life. Not a quick way at all.

Not a quick way at all. PhDs are quite a commitment. Again representative of how you're not the category of CECs I make fun of.

 

[sidou]

there is a questions in ITA forms saying : Have you listed all of X's periods of military service or government positions (if any), and all of the organizations that X belongs to (if any)?

for someone who did not passe any military service but he works as a teacher in a public school, should he answer as Yes, No, Not applicable ?

is teaching in a public school considered as government positions ? if so then the answer should be yes ?

 

[ElvisRamaj]

there is a questions in ITA forms saying : Have you listed all of X's periods of military service or government positions (if any), and all of the organizations that X belongs to (if any)?

for someone who did not passe any military service but he works as a teacher in a public school, should he answer as Yes, No, Not applicable ?

is teaching in a public school considered as government positions ? if so then the answer should be yes ?

Well, yes.

If the government pays the bill, its a government position.

 

[SatNight]

Not a quick way at all. PhDs are quite a commitment. Again representative of how you're not the category of CECs I make fun of.

That's ok, I wasn't personally offended, nor offended for CEC in general, and I agree with your points. It was more expressing frustration at the apparent number of programs that exist, but the fact the requirements are narrow means that for many of us, EE is the only option. Perhaps some opt for EE even if they have other options (I get it; it's supposed to be quicker), but most people are in EE because there are really no other options. This is why you get so many CEC in the pool, and not because they are too lazy to research PNP programs or something.

I guess the point I am trying to make is that those other programs have requirements that are beyond many people's control. Especially things like NOC specific stuff (or entrepreneur stuff). This is one of the main reasons why I think people are rightfully scared of C-19 because it can ruin the only program that does not exclude candidates so much.

As for CEC, I think the new TR to PR will cover it. Not everyone (I see people being unfairly excluded as always)* but I hope this program will not be part of EE, because it would take EE spots.

We have French. That used to make me optimistic for C-19, but that newest OINP French draw (that was a NOC draw in dusguise) has taught me better.

* When I say unfairly excluded people, I mean on people excluded for no observable reason. Like how some people were excluded with the work permit extension, because of a randomly set eligible work permit expiration date.

 

[wierdaf]

Hey y'all, for outland applicants, do we also get COPR in the IRCC account? or is it possible to get a digital copy through other means? Thanks

 

[dankboi]

9 out of 10 intl students i met here, working on a pgwp have no idea about immigration pathways ircc made for them. they only heard of cec cause pr ancestors who were intl students gives them the advice "ceeyeeceee is da wai" so low ballers new gen intl kids go for cec.

also a kid (not a lawball greasy dude) i know who was in UK arrived in windsor, ON on a SP an year ago and now he's moving to alberta for job and later to apply for PR, Some students research themselves and are making decisions based on the dynamic environment of immigration, meanwhile kfc, burgershot, tim horton nibbles go for cec and complain, instead of researching about the pathways ircc created for them.

 

[seadrag0n]

bruh i am inland and im seeing this everyday. yesterday night, i was explaining OINP shit to an international student living next to my apartment. he said nobody knows this. asking me why ircc is not advertising it so everyone knows it.

Nobody ever can justify students' laziness and their lack of knowledge.

since my pr app reached processing stage i stopped researching about ee and pathways, but the kid from UK i mentioned earlier was constantly looking for options and found an optimized way of reaching pr in minimal time. using 2 year diploma.
canada if wants quality folks to be filled in the economy needs to implement better screening during study permit applications else the market will be filled with such fellas and in return affects everyone.

I didn't know anything about immigrating to Canada, I learned all I know on this forum mainly through the help of other forum members.

 

[dankboi]

I didn't know anything about immigrating to Canada, I learned all I know on this forum mainly through the help of other forum members.

London, UK, late 2020, was bored at work one day when i saw about express entry on google. that's how i reached sudbury, ON and the PR card was delivered yesterday. few pathways for overseas yet achievable. Must note i had the PNP and SP app simultaneously and got both of them approved, and the day landed in Toronto ( 9june 2022) i received RFV and Card on 21 july 2022. All infos was available on the internet and this forum. this forum is second to none. thanks late Mr cohen.

 

[Impatient Dankaroo]

9 out of 10 intl students i met here, working on a pgwp have no idea about immigration pathways ircc made for them. they only heard of cec cause pr ancestors who were intl students gives them the advice "ceeyeeceee is da wai" so low ballers new gen intl kids go for cec.

also a kid (not a lawball greasy dude) i know who was in UK arrived in windsor, ON on a SP an year ago and now he's moving to alberta for job and later to apply for PR, Some students research themselves and are making decisions based on the dynamic environment of immigration, meanwhile kfc, burgershot, tim horton nibbles go for cec and complain, instead of researching about the pathways ircc created for them.

If you're inland and get a 3 year WP, you have no excuse to not get a PR.

You might have to move provinces, work outside your profession and toil but that's a you problem not a PNP problem

 

[dankboi]

If you're inland and get a 3 year WP, you have no excuse to not get a PR.

You might have to move provinces, work outside your profession and toil but that's a you problem not a PNP problem

yes exactly, move, find opportunities, some employers considers the canadian diplomas. my housemate's friend came back to sudbury a week ago from Nova scotia, where he went there to work and get a pr, stayed for 2 years and returned now.

 

[dankboi]

@OneStepAtATime