Tha
- On the OPs EE application, they followed directions and were told 3 years by the system. If, after they receive their ITA, and they put the dates and not the years, I don't know how that is their fault and certainly not fraud. To be sure, a 423 is the safer route to assume.
- I am pre-EE application but am in a similar situation. I joined in the middle of a month. 23 months later, at the end of the month, I got the immediate lay off (restructure) notice. They of course, had to give me the standard ESA severance and vacation accrued which put me over the 2 yrs. However, technically, I was 12 business days short of 2 years (if you add the 7 vacation days and 1 public holiday, it is 4 days short) experience. When/if I enter my dates for my EE application, the system will clearly show 2 years based on what was entered (by OP above). However, on my ITA, would you think this will make a difference? I will be close on points, the reason I ask.
Thanks
Thanks for the input. You are right that I am not senior around here and implied as much in my responses. I can see how being short 2 months may be a problem. A couple of follow-ups though:1 - You are still assuming for calculation purposes that the applicant can claim more than 30 hours per week. Saying "1560 or MORE" is simply not possible as the maximum hours that can be achieved in a year are 1560 - 52 weeks times 30 hours per week.
2 - OP is short of 3 years of work experience by 2 months, you are suggesting he can proceed but you're still failing to understand the he must work for a period of 3 years. Does it not make sense that in order to claim 3 years of work experience one must work for 3 years?
3 - A reasonable period of paid vacations can be counted as part of work experience (not relevant to the topic but still)
4 - I actually commend you for trying to do the research but unfortunately if the OP proceeds it will only grant him a nice rejection letter. This isn't even a complicated case, you're free to ask any senior here and the response will be the same.
5 - Finally I will provide a rejection letter from an applicant who was naive in claiming two years of work experience by counting more than 30 hours per week and without working for a period of two years:
""I have now completed the assessment of your application for a permanent resident visa as a member of
the Canadian Experience Class and have determined that you do not meet the requirements for
immigration to Canada.
Section 11.2 of IRPA requires that information provided in your Express Entry Profile concerning your
eligibility to be invited to apply (10.3(1)(e)) as well as the qualifications on the basis of which you were
ranked (10.3(1)(h)) be valid both at the time the invitation was issued and at the time the application for
permanent residence is received.
Citizenship and Immigration Canada invited you to apply for permanent resident status based on the
qualifications you claimed in your Express Entry profile.
In your Express Entry profile you indicated that you possess 2 years of Canadian work experience as
defined under Section 1 of the Ministerial Instructions Respecting the Express Entry System.
Based on the documentation submitted with your application for permanent residence I am not satisfied
you possess 2 years of Canadian work experience.
This change in your qualifications resulted in a loss of points that brought your rank below the lowest
ranking person who was invited to apply in your round of invitation, under the Express Entry
Comprehensive Ranking System.""
- On the OPs EE application, they followed directions and were told 3 years by the system. If, after they receive their ITA, and they put the dates and not the years, I don't know how that is their fault and certainly not fraud. To be sure, a 423 is the safer route to assume.
- I am pre-EE application but am in a similar situation. I joined in the middle of a month. 23 months later, at the end of the month, I got the immediate lay off (restructure) notice. They of course, had to give me the standard ESA severance and vacation accrued which put me over the 2 yrs. However, technically, I was 12 business days short of 2 years (if you add the 7 vacation days and 1 public holiday, it is 4 days short) experience. When/if I enter my dates for my EE application, the system will clearly show 2 years based on what was entered (by OP above). However, on my ITA, would you think this will make a difference? I will be close on points, the reason I ask.
Thanks