toby said:
The "system" you are trying to beat is other Canadian taxpayers who fund health care with their taxes -- paid over the years. To arrive with an imminent health-care bill, asking how to hoodwink others into paying the bill for you, is a bit indelicate.
Indeed... but I'm a young man, with many taxpaying years ahead of me, that I intend to spend in Canada. It's not my fault that I've only been able to pay taxes for a few years so far.
If I were to move my family to Canada, pay taxes for 10 years, have a baby, then pay taxes another 25 years, there would be no question that we'd be entitled to full health care coverage.
Hell, change 'ten years' to 'three months' and there would still be no question.
But if I move my family to Canada, IMMEDIATELY have a baby, and then pay taxes for 35 years, am I trying to 'hoodwink others into paying the bill for me'?
The only differences are in the order things get done, and in the possibility that, regardless of intent, I may not be able to pay taxes in Canada after the baby is born (I could die, get a disease, etc).
I believe that following the spirit of a law is more important than following the letter of a law, if you know what I mean - but there is a conflict.
The intent (spirit) of our CANADIAN health care system is to provide ALL Canadians with free medical care. I strongly believe that includes myself, my wife, and our children, and I believe Canada would agree (once PR is granted).
However, the intent of the ALBERTAN system is to have a provincial system that benefits the people of Alberta. I have not paid taxes in Alberta, and likely would not reside there for long if I chose to go there at all. By having my baby in Alberta, then paying taxes in BC, I would effectively be taking money from Alberta and giving it to BC. That doesn't seem right.
And of course, if I were concerned only with the letter of the law, I'd land, have the baby in Alberta, and be done with it =p