I am trying to find a pattern in the draws (because I will loose 5 points in 6 weeks). But there does not seem to be a simple one.
For example last year's 22 May draw was held after 35 days (a huge gap), and the score was 755 and yet 1361 applicants were given ITA, but the draw before this one on 17th April was held in 7 days with score of 453, but fewer ITAs were given out - only 715? Why for a lower score were fewer ITAs given out?
Another example are the six draws number 19 through 24. These were preceded by two draws (#17,18) where the score went to all time low of 450 (consecutively giving hope to lot of people), but then it stayed above 460 for six straight draws even when they were spaced out by (above average) three weeks in a three cases.
Does anyone else feel whenever CIC can give around 1500 ITAs where the score is above 450 they declare a draw?
If this is true, I think the draws are meaningless and should be replaced by the simple rule that stated if your score is above 455 (seems to be around the average for this year) you will get an ITA and just do away with the stupid draws? No one will then have to wait for months and days in anticipation. Waiting for your number to be picked up in the draw actually does feel like a stupid lottery.
In my case for example if I had created an EE profile by 1st Jan, I would have been invited twice over, but I really cannot know if I will be invited in any of the next few draws. Life decisions are based on this. I don't know if the scores will go up or down? Sorry about the whining, but you can imagine how frustrating this is.
For example last year's 22 May draw was held after 35 days (a huge gap), and the score was 755 and yet 1361 applicants were given ITA, but the draw before this one on 17th April was held in 7 days with score of 453, but fewer ITAs were given out - only 715? Why for a lower score were fewer ITAs given out?
Another example are the six draws number 19 through 24. These were preceded by two draws (#17,18) where the score went to all time low of 450 (consecutively giving hope to lot of people), but then it stayed above 460 for six straight draws even when they were spaced out by (above average) three weeks in a three cases.
Does anyone else feel whenever CIC can give around 1500 ITAs where the score is above 450 they declare a draw?
If this is true, I think the draws are meaningless and should be replaced by the simple rule that stated if your score is above 455 (seems to be around the average for this year) you will get an ITA and just do away with the stupid draws? No one will then have to wait for months and days in anticipation. Waiting for your number to be picked up in the draw actually does feel like a stupid lottery.
In my case for example if I had created an EE profile by 1st Jan, I would have been invited twice over, but I really cannot know if I will be invited in any of the next few draws. Life decisions are based on this. I don't know if the scores will go up or down? Sorry about the whining, but you can imagine how frustrating this is.