- Nov 6, 2009
- 291
- Category........
- Visa Office......
- Accra, Ghana
- Job Offer........
- Pre-Assessed..
- App. Filed.......
- 30-01-2008
- Interview........
- 05-05-2009
What do you do if you are denied at an appeal hearing, but feel your rights were not respected?
This is a friend's situation (really): she just had her appeal hearing, and was denied.
Problem 1: She is a native speaker of English, and her husband is Nigerian. He speaks English well enough to communicate with her; I've met him, and I think his English is good enough. However, at the appeal hearing the Minister's Counsel and the judge were both French-Canadians. Of course they spoke English when talking to the couple, but the Nigerian had a very hard time understanding their French-accented English (not helped by the fact his interview was over the phone). My friend also said she had to strain to understand the two women's English sometimes.
Problem 2: Because her husband could not understand the questions, the Minister's Counsel and the judge clearly got frustrated. They asked some questions 4 times. They raised their voices, and they slammed around papers on their desks, showing they were annoyed.
Problem 3: The judge and the Minister's Counsel sometimes talked to each other in French during the hearing. They asked her if she understood, she said 'no', but they said they were not talking about anything about the case.
Problem 4: She had two witnesses waiting outside, but the judge refused to hear them, saying it was not necessary. She also had several witnesses waiting to testify by phone. The judge also refused to hear them.
Problem 5: The Minister's counsel referred to one email from the husband's brother, and said, "See, this proves they all forge documents." The email was nothing out-of-the-ordinary, and there was no evidence it was forged. Plus she clearly implies here that she thinks all Nigerians are criminals.
In my opinion, there is cause here for a judicial review. The judge and Minister's Counsel clearly did not respect her natural rights: for example, she was not allowed to call all of her witnesses. What should she do? She doesn't have a lawyer. I think for a judicial review, she will need one. She wants to send a letter of complaint to the Immigration Appeal Division and the Canada Border Services Agency. Does anyone have any advice?
This is a friend's situation (really): she just had her appeal hearing, and was denied.
Problem 1: She is a native speaker of English, and her husband is Nigerian. He speaks English well enough to communicate with her; I've met him, and I think his English is good enough. However, at the appeal hearing the Minister's Counsel and the judge were both French-Canadians. Of course they spoke English when talking to the couple, but the Nigerian had a very hard time understanding their French-accented English (not helped by the fact his interview was over the phone). My friend also said she had to strain to understand the two women's English sometimes.
Problem 2: Because her husband could not understand the questions, the Minister's Counsel and the judge clearly got frustrated. They asked some questions 4 times. They raised their voices, and they slammed around papers on their desks, showing they were annoyed.
Problem 3: The judge and the Minister's Counsel sometimes talked to each other in French during the hearing. They asked her if she understood, she said 'no', but they said they were not talking about anything about the case.
Problem 4: She had two witnesses waiting outside, but the judge refused to hear them, saying it was not necessary. She also had several witnesses waiting to testify by phone. The judge also refused to hear them.
Problem 5: The Minister's counsel referred to one email from the husband's brother, and said, "See, this proves they all forge documents." The email was nothing out-of-the-ordinary, and there was no evidence it was forged. Plus she clearly implies here that she thinks all Nigerians are criminals.
In my opinion, there is cause here for a judicial review. The judge and Minister's Counsel clearly did not respect her natural rights: for example, she was not allowed to call all of her witnesses. What should she do? She doesn't have a lawyer. I think for a judicial review, she will need one. She wants to send a letter of complaint to the Immigration Appeal Division and the Canada Border Services Agency. Does anyone have any advice?