Latest Immigration Court Decisions
Yazdani v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)
Decider: Leonard S. Mandamin J.
Court: Federal Court
Citation: 2010 FC 885
Judgement: September 9, 2010
Docket: IMM-260-10, IMM-261-10, IMM-318-10, IMM-319-10, IMM-321-10
[61] In the case at hand, there had been no prior successful email transmission between the Warsaw visa office and the Consultant’s office. Nor does the CTC Protocol on Email Communications contemplate and provide safeguard measures for email transmission failures (such as alternate follow up by mailing the letter). Finally, the visa application system does not provide for reconsideration in such circumstances.
[62] The Respondent chose to send an important and crucial notice to the Applicant via email without safeguards in place. Having regard for the foregoing, I conclude the Respondent bears the risk of an email transmission failure when it sent the crucial request to the Applicant.
Conclusion
[63] I find the Respondent to bear the risk in the Applicant’s case as well as in the related cases for the failure of email delivery of the crucial request for additional documentation.
[64] On the facts of this case, I allow the judicial review in this application as well as the related applications included in the consolidation.