At the risk of responding to a spoof:
Ditto cautions from alphazip and eileenf (in another albeit similar thread).
Sure, completing bureaucratic forms can be an exercise far from what seems like common-sense.
But, using common-sense is still a good idea.
Where the forms themselves deviate from common-sense, follow the form. Otherwise, follow the instructions using common-sense.
The address to enter is the address you actually had, as it would be printed on the envelope of something mailed to that address. Sure, accepted abbreviations are fine. But it needs to be the address of a place you actually established residence in, not just some place you were staying. The application form does not ask for daily location. It asks for places of residence.
In particular, given all these questions, some down to the level of where to enter a hyphen, gives the impression of not understanding what the application is asking for, or what CIC will look at and consider, let alone what might seem suspicious to CIC.
Probably no great insight or wisdom necessary to foresee that detailing an address for a mere three day period of time, as if that is someone's residential address, is likely to incite questions, if not outright suspicion. It is, after all, highly unlikely that someone actually establishes residence at a location and then re-establishes residence elsewhere just a few days later.
Impression: either you are overthinking (way overthinking) the details . . . or . . . . your application is destined to go way off the rails (maybe the real question is how do you spell "RQ?" ) . . . or . . . the questions are a joke.
If it is just a bit of overthinking, step back, relax, take a deep breath, and use some common-sense.
I would note, for example, if you are listing a foreign address, for a period of time spent outside Canada, definitely relax, give your best account of where you were living abroad for the respective month and be sure the city is correct, otherwise the details are essentially of little import.
