Strange, I am a regular EE candidate (FSW-O) so do not have a PNP nomination. Does it still have a meaning here?
Also, can you take a look at the above post (reproduced below), and let me know what you think about my status? Can I consider my eligibility passed?
"
I received my GCMS notes recently. Everything looks in order except for proof of settlement funds, where the case analyst has put in "Review required, family of 3 requires $18, 825".
In his overall recommendation, he has put in: 'A11.2 Met, R75 FSW Minimum Requirements - Appears Met, R76 Selection Criteria - FSW Points - Appears Met, FSW Points Total: 72, Outstanding Documents (Not Requested):- RPRF Ready to Finalize, RPRF: Outstanding'
For a bit of background: I showed my settlement funds proof by disclosing savings in a bank account + my gratuity fund entitlement which I will receive once I leave my current job (which I plan to do as soon as I receive my PR). The gratuity fund covers around 20% of my settlement fund requirements.
The current assessment status shows:
Eligibility: Not started
Security: Not started
Criminality: Passed
Medical: Passed
Info Sharing: Complete
However, it appears they changed eligibility from 'Review Required' to 'Met' to 'Not started' during the application review process. There are no dates mentioned in the relevant fields (they are blank).
Is this normal? Reading the notes, my biggest concern right now is whether they will accept gratuity as a valid proof of settlement fund?
"