Yes - that's very good advice. That's exactly what you should do. Better to file a few back years then to be on the IRS sh*t list.mmshock said:Done and done. Accountant said it really is not an issue. I truly owe nothing and have loads of proof. We'll just file back a few years as a precaution when I do my 2011 return. Then I'll be a bit more regular perhaps!
Its just so silly. If the IRS went after me something is seriously wrong, as it would cost them more to investigate my situation than they would stand to make.
The reporting threshold is basically "did you have control of US$10,000 in non-U.S. accounts at any point during the year?" It doesn't matter if it's a joint account, or if all the accounts you have control over have less than $10,000 each. If you have $4000 worth in Canada, $4000 worth in Australia, and $4000 worth in Finland, you must report all of your foreign accounts.Calgary-Bound said:So If theres limits on how much you can make and keep In your account.Is It better to have a seperate account than your spouse or does It not matter?Also the best way to file would be seperately?
As someone posted above, Canada has a similar requirement but with a much higher reporting threshold (C$100,000). I think the point is additional "leverage" in cases where they suspect tax evasion or money laundering, but have no proof: in those cases, they can get you just for not reporting the foreign assets, and they don't have to prove that you did anything seriously wrong.can_usa_97 said:Exactly, Calgary-bound - I think it is silly and US is the only one who does it from my understanding. I think it should be exempt for anywhere with a tax treaty! I am assuming is has something to do with the whole transfer of 10k thing, not sure though.