- Mar 3, 2016
- 3
- Category........
- Visa Office......
- Hong Kong
- Job Offer........
- Pre-Assessed..
- App. Filed.......
- January 2015
- Interview........
- March 2016 Refused. Submit Appeal ........: March 2016 . Bluebook Recieved ........: June 2016. Waiting for Appearance Date......: November 2016. WTF?
The appeal is registered. Already I have seen the interview files in hand. There was a sponsorship interview very similar to mine, the same day even, probably the same VO rejecting applicants for the most lame reasons . Contrary to your belief, I think there is a continual rejection of spousal applicants being screwed over at this office for trivial reasons. As example, I will find this applicant's name here. [ Read his story :Quote from: wjmund on March 02, 2016, 08:12:18 amAlurra71 said:I think your assessment that many Chinese applicants are refused for whatever reason is certainly not a founded one, at least, not based on data that is available here on this particular website for various sponsorship applicants. I think you will find that YOUR particular situation and evidences are what accumulated to cause your wife's rejection.
They put the responsibility of appeal in the sponsors hand because they are assuming that you are the one that wants your spouse to come here therefore if that is the case you will appeal a decision you feel is wrong. If they left it to the spouse to do the appeal, where does that leave the sponsor if they have since decided against the immigration? The sponsor is the responsible party in this type of situation because of these issues.
I can tell you from the outside (what you've typed here) that your marriage sounds more like some sort of a contract than it does a loving relationship entered into by two individuals who have deep expressed feelings for one another. I would suggest you get your appeal letter sent and also order your GCMS notes to see what particular issues triggered a negative response. Focus on those instances to try to assuage their initial findings. If you don't and you speak of your relationship in person in the same type of 'tone' that is conveyed here, I suspect your appeal will also fail.
Best of luck to you.
My wife just had her interview in Hong Kong. Here are the main points:
My dear husband Warren
The Hongkong interview visa officer is a visa officer is Hongkong Chinese female, she is from the beginning to treat me with suspicion,
Her suspicion is:
1, we in the online E-mail, 2 months of marriage, too fast.
2, your family didn't attend our wedding,
3, your family and I just met QQ, does not believe to be true.
4, our age difference of 15 years old, she thought that the age is not appropriate.
When she said these words, explanation did not give me the opportunity, he had just said a lot. My translator and I can tell that the visa officer, why do we get married so fast, there is no way in translation.
The visa officer asked me what we talk with the language, I said most in English, I can speak a little english. She asked me in English, she spoke too quickly, and I couldn't understand. She said I don't believe you can speak english. I said, every day we QQ video chat, using the international version of the QQ, if you don't understand can write information, direct translation. ]
That's almost identical to my experience. They reject translation based relationships.
After I read the transcript of my wife's March 3 2016 interview, I see where the VO had a good opportunity to reject our application.
There were 3 issues I suspect doomed the application:
(1) In 1994 my wife conspired with her sister to falsify information on the birth certificate of her fatherless child to enable the kid to have a proper family identity on the household registry. Government agency workers hate seeing people who can pull stunts like this.
(2) I made the fatal mistake of giving our 700 pages of Chat records in Chinese language, not English. The VO discarded the chat evidence immediately .
(3) My wife is totally bored about the details of my life in Canada. There was almost nothing my wife could describe of my personal life in Canada. She could not describe it to the VO.