Cappuccino
VIP Member
- Jun 23, 2009
- 409
- Category........
- Visa Office......
- London
- NOC Code......
- 3131
- Job Offer........
- Pre-Assessed..
- App. Filed.......
- 30-Aug-2010
- AOR Received.
- 15-Dec-2010
- IELTS Request
- Sent with app - 8.5 band score
- Med's Request
- 13-Apr-2011
- Med's Done....
- 19-Apr-2011
- Passport Req..
- 28-June-2011
- VISA ISSUED...
- 21-July-2011
- LANDED..........
- 27-Aug-2011[br][br]ECAS[br]Recd By VO.....: 11-Feb-2011[br]In Process.......: 15-Mar-2011[br]Decision Made.: 25-Jun-2011
Hi.
Actually, I think as a concept the Canada immigration system is very good. The points matrix, requiring language proof, only allowing a controlled number of applicants with in-demand occupation experience. Canada is an underpopulate country and needs skilled immigrants to boost its work force, but it needs the RIGHT immigrants. Of course there is a different between occupations which are recognised as in-demand globally, and those which are in-demand locally within each province - but this is why there are different Federal and Provincial routes under which to apply.
However, where I think the system falls down is how it is implemented. The communication is very poor between CIC/visa offices and the applicants. There is no transparency. Visa offices will tell you they are processing all applications within their priority streams in a very strict date order in which they arrive, but one only has to look at the spreadsheets for each visa office to see clearly that this just ain't so.
Even within the same set of Ministerial Instructions - some "lucky" applicants get visas as quickly as 3 months. Others even post-June-2010 have been waiting for almost 1.5 years with no medical requests yet. And of course that's not even looking at the very large backlog where some applicants have been waiting 3,4,5+ years.
Of course CIC can't wave a magic wand and clear the backlog overnight. But I feel they can do is make things more transparent and make their communication better.
Why should it be necessary to apply for CAIPS/GCMS? Why can't this information be translated and clearly listed on ECAS? The information is there. Why can't each visa office publish their working patterns so that applicants can see exactly what's going on there? There is currently no explaination for some applicants getting very quick 3 to 4 month visas and others at the same visa office in the same set of MI waiting 12 months or more going In Process. A few minutes of someone's time once per week to publish work patterns and to let applicants know exactly what's going on at the visa office's web site, would probably save the visa office having to answer thousands of "what's going on with my application?" queries.
Wayne.
Actually, I think as a concept the Canada immigration system is very good. The points matrix, requiring language proof, only allowing a controlled number of applicants with in-demand occupation experience. Canada is an underpopulate country and needs skilled immigrants to boost its work force, but it needs the RIGHT immigrants. Of course there is a different between occupations which are recognised as in-demand globally, and those which are in-demand locally within each province - but this is why there are different Federal and Provincial routes under which to apply.
However, where I think the system falls down is how it is implemented. The communication is very poor between CIC/visa offices and the applicants. There is no transparency. Visa offices will tell you they are processing all applications within their priority streams in a very strict date order in which they arrive, but one only has to look at the spreadsheets for each visa office to see clearly that this just ain't so.
Even within the same set of Ministerial Instructions - some "lucky" applicants get visas as quickly as 3 months. Others even post-June-2010 have been waiting for almost 1.5 years with no medical requests yet. And of course that's not even looking at the very large backlog where some applicants have been waiting 3,4,5+ years.
Of course CIC can't wave a magic wand and clear the backlog overnight. But I feel they can do is make things more transparent and make their communication better.
Why should it be necessary to apply for CAIPS/GCMS? Why can't this information be translated and clearly listed on ECAS? The information is there. Why can't each visa office publish their working patterns so that applicants can see exactly what's going on there? There is currently no explaination for some applicants getting very quick 3 to 4 month visas and others at the same visa office in the same set of MI waiting 12 months or more going In Process. A few minutes of someone's time once per week to publish work patterns and to let applicants know exactly what's going on at the visa office's web site, would probably save the visa office having to answer thousands of "what's going on with my application?" queries.
Wayne.