@legalfalcon:- Sir Please reflect your view on my GCMS notes. Below are the summary and details of my notes. Thanking you
ASSESSMENTS
Eligibility: Review Require
Security: Not Started
HIRV:
Criminality: Passed
Medical: Passed
Info Sharing: Complete
Due Date: 2019/01/00
FSW MEC: Met
Label: EE Eligibility
Case Analyst: ***REVIEW REQUIRED***Lock-in Date: -----------
E00000000 PA: NAME – NAME SURNAME EE FSW Having analyzed this application based on the documents submitted by the applicant and the information contained in the file, I make the following recommendation.
ANALYST RECOMMENDATION: Review Required
A11.2: Appears Met R75: FSW MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS – Appears Met R76: SELECTION CRITERIA- FSW POINTS/Funds: Appears Met, FSW points total: 74 Outstanding Documents (Not Requested):- RPRF Ready to Finalize RPRF: Outstanding
Comprehensive Ranking System (CRS) CRS Score at invitation to apply (ITA) 444 CRS points minimum score for round: 442 CRS score at application (APR):444 I have reviewed the following for CRS points: PA gained points as MARRIED at ITA and APR PA gained points for 3+year(s) Foreign Work Experience with "A Institute and A Institute, edoc#00000000"
Letter Dated 00/00/2018 appears to confirm employment in declared occupation throughout the specified period, and provides a job description which is consistent with the lead statement and main duties as set out in the declared NOC category.
Letter confirms salary of CAD$ ## /month- Letter confirms full/time employment; FSW Work: 4 years and 3months. CRS Foreign Work: 4 years and 3months. FSW Work: 1 year CRS Foreign Work: 3+year(s)
WORK EXPERIENCE: 4-5year(s), 13 FSW Points
SETTLEMENT FUNDS: Appears To Meet
REVIEW TYPE: Program Assistant APPLICATION #: E0000000 REGULATION: FSW I have reviewed this application based up on the documents submitted by the applicant and the information contained in the file and note the following. MIN. SCORE: 442 CRS SCORE: 444 Principal Applicant Application Promoted: New UCI Spouse Application Promoted: New UCI Dep1 Application Promoted: New UCI Primary Applicant Medical Attached to UCI: Yes Spouse Medical Attached to UCI : Yes Dep 1 Medical Attached to UCI: Yes Client Fees: Verified -----LANGUAGES----- Principal Applicant 1- English- IELTS Met Threshold & Verified Spouse 1 -English IELTS Verified ----- EDUCATION----- Primary Applicant1- ECA report Verified on issuing agency website ; foreign credential confirmed on ECA site ECA Canadian Equivalency Summary reported by issuing agency as Earned doctorate Foreign credential provided Spouse 1- ECA report Verified on issuing agency website; foreign credential confirmed on ECA site ECA Canadian Equivalency Summary reported by issuing agency as Bachelor's degree (three years) and bachelor's degree(four years) Foreign credential provided ----- POLICE CERTIFICATE----- Primary Applicant1- Country police certificate: Provided- NRT R10 OK Recommendation: Pass Criminality Spouse1- Country police certificate: Provided- NRT R10 OK Recommendation: Pass Criminality---- AGE----- Applicant's age reviewed and No Change from ITA to e-APR
Read my post, share in another thread, which is copied here:
Understanding “Review Required”*
A lot of applicants see “review required” in their GCMS notes for eligibility. There are many theories floating around with regard to what “review required” means and if it is alarming.
Before I venture into explaining the significance, it is important to understand that each application goes through the following stages as per the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act and the regulations (Canadian Immigration Law):
R10 – Completeness Check
Criminality
Medicals
A11.2 – eligibility
Security
Out of the above, the most important stage is eligibility. This is also the most time-consuming stage because your documents have to be verified, evaluated and assessed to ascertain that you meet the eligibility criteria for the program you have applied (FSW / CEC / FTW). To stream line this process and make it easier for an immigration officer (decision making authority), all applications are first evaluated by case analysts or program assistants. They review the documents and summarize it in the GCMS. If they have any concerns with any document or want the immigration officer to carefully look into a specific document, they will flag it as “review required.” It is the content of the note that is important here. If the review required is for a specific document, while the summary of the note says that an applicant has met the eligibility, or “ready to finalize” it simply means that while the applicant has met the eligibility criteria, but the specific document needs a careful examination form the officer before promoting (eligibility pass) by the officer.
However, if there are concerns, there will be a review required for the eligibility, and there will be no text to the effect “ready to finalize” or pass. The note will specifically state job duties do not match, or the employment cannot be verified, or the number of years of work experience claimed cannot be verified. This is where an application can land in muddy waters. But the final decision rests on the immigration officer. He may override the decision of the analyst / assistant or go with the analysis of the analyst / assistant.
Even in cases where the analyst / assistant is of the opinion that the applicant has met the eligibility, and there is no “review required,” the officer can replace it with his own opinion. Though rare, but it does happen. This is why the eligibility is only passed when an officer conclusively marks the eligibility as passed.
Finally, there is “review required” for PoF. This is the most common in many applications. This is because, the financial and banking practices of each country are different. Eg. Fixed deposits are know as Certificate of Deposit (CD) in the US. Similarly, treasury bonds, mutual funds, stocks, and many other investment vehicles are there. If your PoF anything other than a bank deposit, it is more likely that it will be marked as “review required.” Also, IRCC does not go by day to day fluctuations in FOREX. Instead, the Canadian federal government issued a quarterly conversion rate for all FOREX vis-a-via CAD. If your PoF is in a foreign currency, then you may have “review required” for the officer to make a determination.
Just because you have “review required” does not mean that you hit the panic mode. Instead, read the context in which it is there. If there is a concern regarding a document, you can send a replacement document via CSE. The most common reasons for RR are:
1. Work reference letter without job duties
2. Work reference letters missing all the details requested by IRCC
3. If you submitted a letter from a colleague because you were unable to get one from your employer, but did not have a LoE on file, this too will lead to RR.
4. Not sufficient work experience in the primary NOC.
5. Inability to verify your employment as your employer details are missing.
There are just some of the scenarios.
In your case you will have to see your GCMS notes to know why you have RR.
Hope this helps.
