Then its same case like i initially said.
1. File IRS.
2. Filing CRA: Include income from US with the total of 1040 AGI line11 and 401k contribution from w2. Mention/include the taxes paid in US. Include RC268 form to get the 401k income exempted from tax. If any additional tax to be paid then contribute to rrsp or pay tax. File it.
If you feel you are not eligible for RC268 then you need to pay additional rrsp contribution or tax to compensate. Per my understanding the form is badly named as commuters but its for US pension contribution amount exemption, nothing more to worry/interpret too much about it.
Use RC268 and see if they accept as you are not doing anything illegal. if they say you are not eligible then you pay the tax.
I and many commuters get audited and get bugged for 3+ years in some tax return. For 2018 audits, i resolved it in 4 iterations and later i paid some final tax to avoid bugging me as they have bad habit of trouble only legal tax payers. So you dont need worry about getting audit and paying taxes later. You are not doing anything illegal. If denial of tax claim is illegal then thousands of people will be in jail for getting tax exemption denied every year.
if you still being doubtful then please check with some tax guys and per my understanding they will too ask you to use RC268.
Hi, I have been reading your contributions on various threads. Thank you so much for all your insights.
I did talk to a few tax consultants as I am also planning to be mostly remote from Canada and commute every month to US work location.
The CPA mentioned that since the economic activity is happening within Canada, CRA will want to be paid first.
What this would mean is, employer will continue to deduct from payroll (as they are supposed to), and we will have to pay CRA first and then claim FTC with IRS to get a refund for whatever the IRS withheld over the course of a year. If IRS gets paid first, CRA will audit and ask for more money. (Leading to a temporary cash-flow issue as we await refund from one entity)
Many CPAs seem to interpret the tax laws differently.
Another CPA mentioned:
"Primary right" refers to Canada’s priority in taxing income for work done within its borders. However, it doesn’t determine the order of payment. Practically, you pay U.S. taxes first (because of withholding rules), and then Canada asserts its right to tax the income related to Canadian workdays, allowing you to apply foreign tax credits to avoid double taxation."
To be absolutely sure, I have set up a paid consult with a cross-border tax lawyer to find out what is the right approach. This confusion seems to be a common theme in many threads and forums.
I will update on this thread as I get more information.