Are you speaking about a multi-entry visa that doesn't require proof of insurance? Because the super visa is issued for ten years and doesn't need to be extended. In this person's case, their passport expired...but they were asking about getting time based on havinga super visa, not a visitor visa.
Yes, it was regular extension
That would be the first time I have ever heard of a person with a super visa not being asked for proof of insurance. Now, with the new multi-entry visas, more and more people are also being asked to show proof of insurance to get that visa, depending on their medical exams. I have seen these type of requests over the last year with people receiving multi-entry visa's. Can anyone confirm this will be the new trend?
Parents were asked for meds when they applied for Multiple in India but no insurance requirement
User828, when you didn't have to show any insurance, that was because it was for a multi-entry visa, right? And the medical tests didn't show any issues that would make them ask for insurance too?
Not related, issue or not, insurance is an option ( unless its supervisa )
Thanks for reply.
I'd encourage super visa applicants to get a quote from a comparable resource like BestQuote Travel Insurance Agency (it's free, instant, and you don't need to engage with a saleperson with questions until you are ready). BestQuote has all the visitor to Canada policies, so you'll always find the better (or cheaper) policies on your quote, and they make it easy to review the details of each policy:
https://www.bestquotetravelinsurance.ca/super-visa-insurance
They'll also answer any of your questions, and help guide you in the right direction.