Hi, would my story below prevent me from getting my study permit?
In 2014 I was fined about C$750 (close to the minimum amout possible), or the option to go to jail for 10 days instead of paying the fine. This is the only thing I've ever been convicted/fined for in my life.
I've read different things different places about what is considered a summary offence and what is not. Most places say it's a summary offence if the maximum fine is C$5000 and/or imprisonment of 6 months or less, and then I've read somewhere else that it is fines up to C$5000 and/or a maximum imprisonment of 2 years. Though I think that's a Hybrid Offence which can go either way?
Some other things that define a summary offence:
Accused must be charged with a summery conviction within 6 months after act happened: This is so different from country to country so I'm not sure what it would be in Canada. Though I know it has a time limit, unlike how it is with Indictable offences which has no time limit.
Accused does not have to submit fingerprints when charged under Summary Conviction: I never had to do this either.
Appeals of summary conviction offences go first to the highest trial court within the jurisdiction: In Norway it would have gone to the 'lowest' court within the jurisdiction.
I never had to go to court for it either. I simply got a letter asking if I wanted to accept the fine or appeal it.
The thing is that the actual law/criminal code(?) I was fined under has a maximum of 3 years in jail and/or fines. So even if I got no jail time and the fine was way lower than what it has to be for it to be considered a summary fine I'm still not sure if it would be considered one due to that. The law/criminal code is also the milder version of two. The one I was fined under is theft/embezzlement and the other is for serious theft/embezzlement. So I think it was for petty theft/embezzlement.
Why I was fined
I worked at a grocery store and took with me some food home as I had left my wallet at home. Came back the next day and paid for it. But since it was noticed during a random inspection of the CCTV cameras and the store has a zero tolerance they had no choice but to report it, even though they told me they were sorry they had to.
So to sum it up everything points to it being a summary offence apart from the maxium jail time I could have gotten is 3 years. (Which might be different in Canada for all I know).
PS: Since this was 2 years ago I would still have 3 years left before I am deemed rehabilitated if it's not considered a summary offence. And I can't wait 3 years to start studying.
I figured I would ask here before I contact a lawyer and have to pay money to get a response.
In 2014 I was fined about C$750 (close to the minimum amout possible), or the option to go to jail for 10 days instead of paying the fine. This is the only thing I've ever been convicted/fined for in my life.
I've read different things different places about what is considered a summary offence and what is not. Most places say it's a summary offence if the maximum fine is C$5000 and/or imprisonment of 6 months or less, and then I've read somewhere else that it is fines up to C$5000 and/or a maximum imprisonment of 2 years. Though I think that's a Hybrid Offence which can go either way?
Some other things that define a summary offence:
Accused must be charged with a summery conviction within 6 months after act happened: This is so different from country to country so I'm not sure what it would be in Canada. Though I know it has a time limit, unlike how it is with Indictable offences which has no time limit.
Accused does not have to submit fingerprints when charged under Summary Conviction: I never had to do this either.
Appeals of summary conviction offences go first to the highest trial court within the jurisdiction: In Norway it would have gone to the 'lowest' court within the jurisdiction.
I never had to go to court for it either. I simply got a letter asking if I wanted to accept the fine or appeal it.
The thing is that the actual law/criminal code(?) I was fined under has a maximum of 3 years in jail and/or fines. So even if I got no jail time and the fine was way lower than what it has to be for it to be considered a summary fine I'm still not sure if it would be considered one due to that. The law/criminal code is also the milder version of two. The one I was fined under is theft/embezzlement and the other is for serious theft/embezzlement. So I think it was for petty theft/embezzlement.
Why I was fined
I worked at a grocery store and took with me some food home as I had left my wallet at home. Came back the next day and paid for it. But since it was noticed during a random inspection of the CCTV cameras and the store has a zero tolerance they had no choice but to report it, even though they told me they were sorry they had to.
So to sum it up everything points to it being a summary offence apart from the maxium jail time I could have gotten is 3 years. (Which might be different in Canada for all I know).
PS: Since this was 2 years ago I would still have 3 years left before I am deemed rehabilitated if it's not considered a summary offence. And I can't wait 3 years to start studying.
I figured I would ask here before I contact a lawyer and have to pay money to get a response.