Another question im hoping someone could help answer is if this policy is revoked what would happen to all these applications submitted? Would revoking the policy mean that the expenses paid to move families from Sudan to a country where they could do their biometrics and complete the rest of this pathways requirements, and all the risks and dire situations endured were for nothing?? Anchors lost family members who were trying to leave to another country to do their biometrics and other requirements to come to safety. I'm hoping an immigration lawyer or consultant could shed some light into the legality apsects of this policy. What can we, as anchors, do to make the government understand how this pathway is affecting our families' life and livelihood in a very negative way at this point in time.
This pathway feels like a false hope to safety, all it did, so far, was causing some canadian anchors to lose family members, destabilizing majority of the applicants who managed to leave for Uganda, Egypt and elsewhere even further by continuing to push the arrival dates to 2027, 2028 and beyond! Their visas to these countries cannot be extended beyond a certain period of time, and it certainly won't be 2027. Tragic situation, really, not to mention the anchors who chose option B, and now their money is locked in banks and can't be accessed until the applicants arrive in 3-4 years, all while they continue to support the same family members theyre sponsoring financially overseas because the jobs are nonexistent in the aforementioned countries they managed to flee to.
