I think the immigration consultants at your school gave you very good advice. You deciding to do a PhD won't raise eyebrows. Unless there's some nefarious aspect of your story that you're not telling anyone?
Not sure what you mean by nefarious? Could you expand on this?
My initial application was as follows
- I demonstrated the flow of funds from the sponsoring company all the way to my school via bank-statements and a receipt of payment
- I enclosed a job offer letter that talked about my responsibilities (all technical, not managerial) in the company
- A small amount of pay-slips as proof.
- I explained how my master's would help my career in this company
- I mentioned I will return to my county -
but now I want to do a PhD and apply for a PR
Beyond this, I enclosed property documents, shareholdings, personal bank statements. I feel this was straightforward and transparent. My application was structured this way because I had a 7-year academic gap (though I worked in my field for the duration of those 7 years).
I guess, what I'm imagining is the VO thinking this while having his morning coffee:
"hey, this guy had a job offer and was sponsored by a company for his master's. Why is he now seeking a PhD? Why did the company let him go?"
But from the conversation here and with the school's consultant it seems such scrutiny is not applied to extensions?