Long debate isn't useful because you cannot argue with a CIC officer with what's legal versus what's not.sababx said:Thanks for reply but my concern is that we both have our names on our passports and that is the extreme form of legal. I submitted an online application and I could only upload one picture of us holding our beloved crest where it says just got married because that is our favorite picture. I just got married last year and I provided two letters, one from her and one from myself just to state that what it means for her to come to Canada. We do not have joint bank account, we did not reside together for more than few months. So yeah, those were the proof that I could come up with.
Wedding pics and stuff is only required for a recent marriage or of some one who was already in Canada and then got married back home.
But the CIC requirement is not a legal concern.
Think of it as - what does it take for you to fake a marriage of convenience i.e. you get married on paper with some one with the sole intent of bringing them to Canada (they paid you for that).
So every thing is legal - marriage certificate, passport can be made.
What is RELATIVELY harder is to involve people in this fake event, have tons of pictures / proof of contact / past trips together, wedding reception card / pictures of actual event etc.
True that you can possibly fake some of these. But then again there is no black or white criteria that would apply to every one. So visa officers use these measures to at least make it more difficult to prevent marriage of convenience.
For some one who has been married for a long time (even before applying for Canada) or have kids etc. no such thing is ever required or heard of.
The other day i heard of a case of a person, who was a citizen and was caught sponsoring his second wife as a PR to Canada. He already sponsored his first wife a few years ago. When CIC dug deeper, they found neither was an actual wife, rather both were his sisters .....
And then we wonder why CIC is so weird...
Hope that helps