I'm not kidding, JO is a Visa Officer at LVO.
She needs to get in touch with HUSBAND ASAP!
This answer was posted on this forum:
Every decision I have read on the matter says an application is not deemed "completed" or "finalized" until the applicant arrives at the port of entry and is granted permanent resident status by the examining officer. This means that AT ANY POINT PRIOR TO LANDING, a sponsorship may be withdrawn. Whether a visa has been issued or not is irrelevant to withdrawal of the sponsorship as long as the person holding the visa has not been examined by an officer and granted entry to Canada as a permanent resident at a port of entry.
The Act and the Regulations are not so much "legal babble", they ARE the final authority. Whatever CIC's website, Guidelines or Operating Manuals state, the final decision made by any judge will refer to the statutes and their intended interpretation by Parliament.
For further clarification, let me tell you what the officer told me at my own landing: he said a week prior he had been required to turn back a wife landing in Canada because her husband had begun receiving welfare AFTER she had been issued her visa. This meant that although she had a visa in her passport, he had ceased to be eligible as a sponsor, and consequently the CBSA officer could not land her as a PR because she was now without an eligible sponsor. If her application had been considered "final" because she had a visa in hand, the officer could not have made that decision, instead he would have been obliged to land her as a PR regardless.
https://www.canadavisa.com/canada-immigration-discussion-board/threads/sponsorship-withdrawal-before-landing.125624/
Which means, IF the SPONSOR has informed IRCC that he believes the Applicant has defrauded HIM/HER, then those are grounds for WITHDRAWL.
Having a VISA in your passport means NOTHING until you LAND and collecting your LUGGAGE at the CAROUSEL.
<<I am saying this for GENERAL MEMBER INFORMATION>>