Hello Forum,
I just wanted some basic advice, and I know every case is different so maybe I'm looking more for feedback? My spouse is Canadian, I am American. We met with an immigration attorney yesterday and after the $300 consultation, he wanted another $6,230 for us to apply for sponsorship. During our consultation, the attorney thoroughly reviewed our case and said that the timeline and evidence appears more than sufficient and that we shouldn't have any problems with the process at all. His fee includes everything from the application to the work permit to the eventual PR status. But after speaking with the attorney, I'm just wondering if it's still worth doing all this work in compiling everything for them, when all they are basically going to do is check it and submit it for us? It just seems like if we stick to the outline and provide ample proof of everything that it may be more economical to do it ourselves? We figured it up and even with printing and binding (our application will be more than thorough & professional) we can still do everything for around $1,000. It's a significant savings, I am confident in our ability to present a satisfying case, but I am not sure if an attorney is going to do anything more for us than we can do ourselves? Or, instead of an attorney, are their consultants or anyone out there who will only review a packet prior to submission? I don't mind paying a smaller fee for a legal review, I just can't justify $6,500 for an attorney when we can do it all ourselves? Please help
I just wanted some basic advice, and I know every case is different so maybe I'm looking more for feedback? My spouse is Canadian, I am American. We met with an immigration attorney yesterday and after the $300 consultation, he wanted another $6,230 for us to apply for sponsorship. During our consultation, the attorney thoroughly reviewed our case and said that the timeline and evidence appears more than sufficient and that we shouldn't have any problems with the process at all. His fee includes everything from the application to the work permit to the eventual PR status. But after speaking with the attorney, I'm just wondering if it's still worth doing all this work in compiling everything for them, when all they are basically going to do is check it and submit it for us? It just seems like if we stick to the outline and provide ample proof of everything that it may be more economical to do it ourselves? We figured it up and even with printing and binding (our application will be more than thorough & professional) we can still do everything for around $1,000. It's a significant savings, I am confident in our ability to present a satisfying case, but I am not sure if an attorney is going to do anything more for us than we can do ourselves? Or, instead of an attorney, are their consultants or anyone out there who will only review a packet prior to submission? I don't mind paying a smaller fee for a legal review, I just can't justify $6,500 for an attorney when we can do it all ourselves? Please help