SINP - JANUARY INTAKE 2016 Q&A.
- Thread starter andy108
- Start date
I have applied to sinp on 5 jan but i think i have made a mistake in my spouse background declaration form..please help if its ok or shd i send the form again
In the education column no 7 My spouse enrolled for mba from 2010 to 2012 however due to some issues he did not receive his degree till date,so i did not specify that in the education field([post secondary )the no of years and neither in the column the details for the mba
Education
Give the number of years of school you successfully completed for each of the following levels of education
however i have specified this in column 8 details of the activity that from 2010 to 2012 he was doing mba but degree not received...whta to do please help???
In the education column no 7 My spouse enrolled for mba from 2010 to 2012 however due to some issues he did not receive his degree till date,so i did not specify that in the education field([post secondary )the no of years and neither in the column the details for the mba
Education
Give the number of years of school you successfully completed for each of the following levels of education
however i have specified this in column 8 details of the activity that from 2010 to 2012 he was doing mba but degree not received...whta to do please help???
Applied 04-Jan 2016 OID
Settlement fund showing converted from 04th January with filed application. Every line of Settlement Fund section is filled, nothing empty.
What a wonder! Is it SINP common practice now or by mistake in my case only? This is the Snapshot :-
Institution Name The Karur Vysya Bank Limited
Account Number 230217200000*****
Account Holder's Name Ashutosh Kumar Dubey
Settlement Fund Type Savings
Total Dollar Amount in Foreign currency 12,05,772
Currency Type Indian rupee
Total Dollar amount in Canadian currency $25,294.00
Date of Bank Statement 30-Dec-2015
Date of Conversion 31-Dec-2015
Settlement Plan Attached Yes
Settlement fund showing converted from 04th January with filed application. Every line of Settlement Fund section is filled, nothing empty.
What a wonder! Is it SINP common practice now or by mistake in my case only? This is the Snapshot :-
Institution Name The Karur Vysya Bank Limited
Account Number 230217200000*****
Account Holder's Name Ashutosh Kumar Dubey
Settlement Fund Type Savings
Total Dollar Amount in Foreign currency 12,05,772
Currency Type Indian rupee
Total Dollar amount in Canadian currency $25,294.00
Date of Bank Statement 30-Dec-2015
Date of Conversion 31-Dec-2015
Settlement Plan Attached Yes
I have submitted my SINP application, My NOC is 2281 (Submitted the following university degrees) on 3rd Jan 2016 & my application status are: Application Received.
1) B.Tech (Computer Science).
2) M.Tech (Computer Science).
3) MBA (IT).
Also the WES ECA report.
The query are: Is it necessary/mandatory to submit my training certificates like (international certifications, technical trainings/courses etc.).
Guys please advice i haven't submitted anything realted to Training /Certifications / Courses Certificates.
1) B.Tech (Computer Science).
2) M.Tech (Computer Science).
3) MBA (IT).
Also the WES ECA report.
The query are: Is it necessary/mandatory to submit my training certificates like (international certifications, technical trainings/courses etc.).
Guys please advice i haven't submitted anything realted to Training /Certifications / Courses Certificates.
joyaman
Star Member
- Nov 16, 2015
- 0
- Category........
- NOC Code......
- 2221
- Job Offer........
- Pre-Assessed..
- Nomination.....
- 09-05-2016 sinp
- AOR Received.
- 09-06-2016 cic
- Med's Done....
- 15-06-2016
joyaman
Star Member
- Nov 16, 2015
- 0
- Category........
- NOC Code......
- 2221
- Job Offer........
- Pre-Assessed..
- Nomination.....
- 09-05-2016 sinp
- AOR Received.
- 09-06-2016 cic
- Med's Done....
- 15-06-2016
Hi folks,
i applied in this jan 2016 and in the intake.But i have a stupid problem with my reference letter. I actually work for whole of the week full time except sundays. The reference letter says i work full time 50 hours a week. I work for more than 50 hours in a week because i work on a task based job, i mean, i have to work on the given task per day and could not leave the office until i do not complete my task. Simply speaking, i have to reach the office at 9 A.m and cannot leave the office until the task is complete. Sometimes i have to stay in the office till mid night. Office time is 9 to 5 Pm.
I have heard that in Canada, there is a trend of 40 hours a week job and reference letters are made for the 40 hours a week, not more than this. Now i am in the tensions that i did not pay attention to this and did this stupid thing of not to correct 50 hours and mention 48 hours. If i correct this in the reference letter, this means that i am backing out of my first statement. Very much confused about this issue. What should i do now....!? Please suggest.
Secondly, there is a mistake in the job responsibilities. There is a technology called RS in which i work but the typist has typed this technology as RX. Just a typing error which i did not notice and sent the reference letter to SINP.
These are the two issues and i am confused about. If i explain these two things to SINP, this means i am highlighting my own mistakes, otherwise, This is possible that the file officer may not notice these two things and consider it accordingly!
Please suggest me some thing! em very tensed here in this matter!
Regard!
i applied in this jan 2016 and in the intake.But i have a stupid problem with my reference letter. I actually work for whole of the week full time except sundays. The reference letter says i work full time 50 hours a week. I work for more than 50 hours in a week because i work on a task based job, i mean, i have to work on the given task per day and could not leave the office until i do not complete my task. Simply speaking, i have to reach the office at 9 A.m and cannot leave the office until the task is complete. Sometimes i have to stay in the office till mid night. Office time is 9 to 5 Pm.
I have heard that in Canada, there is a trend of 40 hours a week job and reference letters are made for the 40 hours a week, not more than this. Now i am in the tensions that i did not pay attention to this and did this stupid thing of not to correct 50 hours and mention 48 hours. If i correct this in the reference letter, this means that i am backing out of my first statement. Very much confused about this issue. What should i do now....!? Please suggest.
Secondly, there is a mistake in the job responsibilities. There is a technology called RS in which i work but the typist has typed this technology as RX. Just a typing error which i did not notice and sent the reference letter to SINP.
These are the two issues and i am confused about. If i explain these two things to SINP, this means i am highlighting my own mistakes, otherwise, This is possible that the file officer may not notice these two things and consider it accordingly!
Please suggest me some thing! em very tensed here in this matter!
Regard!