+1(514) 937-9445 or Toll-free (Canada & US) +1 (888) 947-9445
yogeshdoon said:
I think that SINP is processing the application according to the points applicants claimed. May be i could be wrong but this is only my perception. What do you think guys....I claimed 63 points out of 100.

mine 60
 
gulbadan.singh said:
Bro dont be that much pessimistic ...... everything will be good with us.

if they have showd in process for a 3rd Jan Applicant then all the 2nd Jan applicants are already processed..

Only thing is there portal is not updated just like some got Review Letters and some not.

My Friends, I am not pessimistic but SASK really is unpredictable and unclear!
In my previous post I told that, because the statistic in their website is nonsense! :P If they want to send our nomination letters within 2 or 3 months then why they mentioned 80% of applicants waiting time is 13 months!!! :o

For those still thinking of finding the reason how they work and why they don't work as we understand then I have to say: Believe me, They don't have any specific rule for their work! When they even don't send review emails correctly then you want to say they are working on fuzzy logic algorithm?!!! ;D It seems there are a table and all those 250 applications are on that and they shuffle and take one among those 250! :o Its easy with RND function in programming!!! ;) ;D

Take it easy my friends because SASK is SASK and we will be one of them in next years! :-\ ;D
 
yogeshdoon said:
I think that SINP is processing the application according to the points applicants claimed. May be i could be wrong but this is only my perception. What do you think guys....I claimed 63 points out of 100.

Mine is 63 too ;)
 
VictorPapa said:
My Friends, I am not pessimistic but SASK really is unpredictable and unclear!
In my previous post I told that, because the statistic in their website is nonsense! :P If they want to send our nomination letters within 2 or 3 months then why they mentioned 80% of applicants waiting time is 13 months!!! :o

For those still thinking of finding the reason how they work and why they don't work as we understand then I have to say: Believe me, They don't have any specific rule for their work! When they even don't send review emails correctly then you want to say they are working on fuzzy logic algorithm?!!! ;D It seems there are a table and all those 250 applications are on that and they shuffle and take one among those 250! :o Its easy with RND function in programming!!! ;) ;D

Take it easy my friends because SASK is SASK and we will be one of them in next years! :-\ ;D

Really strange!!!!!!!!!!!

Government administration is same in all Countries........ :-)

TS
 
To all members here in this topic:
In Spreadsheet there are people who didn't share information about the second review email. If you are among those people then please update your information. I know, the second email is not important itself but sharing information is very important and it can make us confident, we have update information my friends. ;)
 
VictorPapa said:
To all members here in this topic:
In Spreadsheet there are people who didn't share information about the second review email. If you are among those people then please update your information. I know, the second email is not important itself but sharing information is very important and it can make us confident, we have update information my friends. ;)

Hi,

I have updated just now "Letter not rcvd" but what to write in "letter rcvd date" because without that i am unable t submit.

TS
 
gulbadan.singh said:
Dont worry I have updated yours.

Thank you, Gul.. :)
 
Gul,

We will get what we want. My heart and 'hands' are open to receive.

Best wishes everyone.
 
kumarashok said:
based on the processing time, we may get nominee on Feb 2015.
If the processing times remain the same, I hope the processing times will be shorter due to online system, as promised by SINP
 
gulbadan.singh said:
Super Monday is here.....

are we going to get what we want or not....

Gul why is yogeshdoon status again blank earlier it was in process.