Fat Canadian Lady, or Immigrant Lady? :-*sashali78 said:Thanks guys
Don't forget to bring more votes for the petition - it ain't over until the fat lady sings...
Bill C-24 is now a law. Let's see if the Tories win or loose this election.Hopefulagain said:Anyone knows where we are with this?
I believe that the bill has already been "assented to". Should we lose all hope, now?
Everything has gone so quiet on this front, it seems that the govt is quietly pushing it while our attentions are diverted.
So what does this mean? 4 years of residence as PR to get citizenship, and precious time of residence doesn't count?maniac2403 said:Bill C-24 is now a law. Let's see if the Tories win or loose this election.
That's exactly what it means. But that being said, this could change if the Tories loose and the bill is amended. But its safe to say, that start counting 365*4 after PR to apply for citizenship.ZingyDNA said:So what does this mean? 4 years of residence as PR to get citizenship, and precious time of residence doesn't count?
Agreed! Two classes of Citizens will be created with this bill. Naturalized vs. Born in Canada. This will hit people who have dual citizenship the hardest, as those only with Canadian citizenship cannot be left stateless.LPS said:The more contentious part of this bill is that the minister can deprive people of citizenship who have committed certain offences. I'd expect this to be revisited if the Tories lose, assuming it hasn't been successfully challenged in court already.
Right - Canada could not deprive someone of their only citizenship, by international convention (as I understand it) - I'm interested in what the court says about dual citizens, though...maniac2403 said:Agreed! Two classes of Citizens will be created with this bill. Naturalized vs. Born in Canada. This will hit people who have dual citizenship the hardest, as those only with Canadian citizenship cannot be left stateless.
What irks me the most about this bill is that a minister now has all the power in the world. Application approvals and citizenship cancellation will not be going to Judge anymore. Most likely this clause will be contested in courts.LPS said:Right - Canada could not deprive someone of their only citizenship, by international convention (as I understand it) - I'm interested in what the court says about dual citizens, though...
What is particularly interesting is that this actually applies to the journalist charged and convicted of terrorism in Egypt recently who holds dual citizenship. Not surprisingly the government has said that they will not be revoking Canadian citizenship in this case, but it's easy to imagine that someone who did not have the same profile or who found themselves in trouble after the initial backlash regarding this bill has died down would not be so lucky.LPS said:The more contentious part of this bill is that the minister can deprive people of citizenship who have committed certain offences. I'd expect this to be revisited if the Tories lose, assuming it hasn't been successfully challenged in court already.