Hi guys,
I have a question to you all...
Have any of you, or someone you know, been convicted in a 'summary offense' that does NOT make you inadmissible to Canada, and was therefore clear about that case in his/her immigration application....and was afterwards accepted?
Or is it always better, since the conviction is not that critical, NOT to mention it in the application?
The confusion comes from a curiosity on whether the officer who studies my file will concentrate on the case and study it deeply, or will he/she decide to cancel the file without even bothering to study it, just because there is a summary offense in it...so in this case I would be taking a risk of mentioning something that might not be realized anyways, if not mentioned...
But at the same time, it's even a bigger risk not to mention something and then appear to have lied in my application !! which is the worst thing..
What do you guys think?
I have a question to you all...
Have any of you, or someone you know, been convicted in a 'summary offense' that does NOT make you inadmissible to Canada, and was therefore clear about that case in his/her immigration application....and was afterwards accepted?
Or is it always better, since the conviction is not that critical, NOT to mention it in the application?
The confusion comes from a curiosity on whether the officer who studies my file will concentrate on the case and study it deeply, or will he/she decide to cancel the file without even bothering to study it, just because there is a summary offense in it...so in this case I would be taking a risk of mentioning something that might not be realized anyways, if not mentioned...
But at the same time, it's even a bigger risk not to mention something and then appear to have lied in my application !! which is the worst thing..
What do you guys think?