+1(514) 937-9445 or Toll-free (Canada & US) +1 (888) 947-9445
Send a webform, you might receive a direct reply on your decision or an update from Ottowa because they reply within 15 days.
I already raised 4 webforms but haven't recieved any thing from them
 
We were told to disregard the AIP because it was sent by error, not to worry because some of them already got their PPRs
Not everyone of us were told right? Some of them recieved another mail stating that their AIP were sent by an error. And so far i haven't received any such
 
I got my Medical passed on 14th December.
Timeline
date applied :20th july
medical: upfront
Bio Metric: march 2019 as i have visitor visa
AIP: 3rd September
Country: India
Category: SDS

Also I have the same PA address issue in my AIP but I have gone through GCMS notes and there it is mentioned that Review is passed on 3rd September so i dont think its a glitch.

DLI is covid ready.

Lets hope for the best and hope to get good news soon.
 
I got my Medical passed on 14th December.
Timeline
date applied :20th july
medical: upfront
Bio Metric: march 2019 as i have visitor visa
AIP: 3rd September
Country: India
Category: SDS

Also I have the same PA address issue in my AIP but I have gone through GCMS notes and there it is mentioned that Review is passed on 3rd September so i dont think its a glitch.

DLI is covid ready.

Lets hope for the best and hope to get good news soon.
Is it "recommend passed" or "passed" for you in thr eligibility section.
 
Not everyone of us were told right? Some of them recieved another mail stating that their AIP were sent by an error. And so far i haven't received any such

No thats a misconception, every July AIP is not sent by Error, those AIPs were only sent to Pakistani applicants, I am assuming you're from India, so you don't have to worry about the Error incident.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ShaUCan
Is it "recommend passed" or "passed" for you in thr eligibility section.
Its recommend Passed,

but its very old, in month of September, I ordered it to check if AIP was genuine or glitch.

One one of the pages under Organisations and Entities 3 in other sub type Description, mentioned "Two Stage SPs"
and there is one effective date row having date of 3rd September. I have ordered the latest GCMS notes 4th December to know the current status and still waiting for them.
 
I got my Medical passed on 14th December.
Timeline
date applied :20th july
medical: upfront
Bio Metric: march 2019 as i have visitor visa
AIP: 3rd September
Country: India
Category: SDS

Also I have the same PA address issue in my AIP but I have gone through GCMS notes and there it is mentioned that Review is passed on 3rd September so i dont think its a glitch.

DLI is covid ready.

Lets hope for the best and hope to get good news soon.
Did you raise a webform for medical ?
 
Did you raise a webform for medical ?

No, I was planning and I am still planning but the consultant is against it and I am against him :cool:. If I dont get another update by Thursday, I will raise a webform on Friday.
 
No thats a misconception, every July AIP is not sent by Error, those AIPs were only sent to Pakistani applicants, I am assuming you're from India, so you don't have to worry about the Error incident.
You are right, but the reality is that it's not humanly possible to track and address all the error AIPs. It's still possible that a tiny portion of SDS files from China, India, Morocco, Pakistan, Philippines, Senegal & Vietnam may still be infected with this glitch. It could be anyone.


I already had received GCMS notes before I got my AIP on Sep 3rd. It mentions
Primary Office: CPC EDMONTON
Secondary Office: CPC - OTTAWA

GCMS - https://ibb.co/tcDs3sR

GCMS Generated date Aug 28th. AIP- Sep 3rd.

OP belonging to the other thread was refused because his eligibility was blank. As long as the GCMS notes are fine, and there are no symptoms, it's good to go. It's impossible for the eligibility to go backwards from "recommend pass", do not believe these rumours on the internet. For study permit applications, recommend pass is as good as passed, the definitions shared in these forums by certain people have less knowledge on the subject and have no clue what they are talking about, quoting express entry definitions for study permit shows their naivety.
 
Last edited:
Complete file lodged on 8 july sds category
Clg approved in first dli list
Aip received on 3 sept on mail
Then no update but
Medical passed on 11 dec on gc key

When I will be expected my results
 
AIP is still statistically safe, this is the last time I should see any of you commenting on this refusal after AIP bandwagon, hopefully. Focus on the positive side instead of highlighting the 0.0001 % probability of the negative portion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pradeep Reddy
You are right, but the reality is that it's not humanly possible to track and address all the error AIPs. It's still possible that a tiny portion of SDS files from China, India, Morocco, Pakistan, Philippines, Senegal & Vietnam may still be infected with this glitch. It could be anyone.




OP belonging to the other thread was refused because his eligibility was blank, even after receiving the AIP. As long as the GCMS notes are fine, and there are no symptoms, it's good to go. It's impossible for the eligibility to go backwards from "recommend pass", do not believe these rumours on the internet. For study permit applications, recommend pass is as good as passed, the definitions shared in these forums by certain people have less knowledge on the subject and have no clue what they are talking about, quoting express entry definitions for study permit shows their naivety.

what just because eligibility was blank . He was refused like no proper reason was given to him ?
 
what just because eligibility was blank . He was refused like no proper reason was given to him ?
Yup, it's old news, you are asking this question this late ? They sometimes do this to meet the demanding volume of files to be processed and have no time to investigate these glitches/discrepancies so they just simply refuse. Its not normal to have the eligibility blanked out. It was one of the symptoms.

AIP is still statistically safe, this is the last time I should see any of you commenting on this refusal after AIP bandwagon, hopefully. Focus on the positive side instead of highlighting the 0.0001 % probability of the negative portion.
 
Last edited: