Good on you for trying to analyse the situation, rather than just putting out absurd predictions like so many other people!
However, I think you are making a few incorrect assumptions. To clarify:
0) EE is a
two-step process: First, your
eligibility is tested, then you are ranked against everyone who is eligible (i.e.
prioritisation)
1) The 100 points system is used to determine
eligibility for FSWP applicants, the CRS system (1200 points) is used to
prioritise these applicants.
2) As a result of this,
no FSWP applicant will be in the pool who has less than 67 points in the eligibility test.
3) Consequently, there is no cut-off CRS score that CIC pre-determines. The cut-off score
is a result of CIC's decision to invite X number of candidates, and then picking those X candidates with the highest CRS scores. The score of the last person who just makes the cut is equal to the cut-off score.
4)
You cannot directly map the 100 FSWP points to the CRS system of 1,200 points because the weights for certain criteria are different, as is the range of points you get for those criteria. As per the above, there is also no need to do this, because the eligibility test already eliminates everyone who doesn't meet the criteria.
5) Further consider that the EE system also administers the FSTP, the CEC and parts of the PNP immigration programs. The eligibility tests for those programs are substantially different, and can result in lower average CRS scores for those sub-groups.
6) Lastly, under EE, the eligibility criteria for the individual immigration programs were not changed. The only thing that changes is the order in which applications are processed. As a result, the most promising candidates will be given priority - which should lead to a better quality of immigrants (as measured by CRS system) compared to previously (as long as # of ITAs < size of the pool).
Hope this clarifies a few points...