+1(514) 937-9445 or Toll-free (Canada & US) +1 (888) 947-9445

Rule 26 Exclusion- section F (b)

9990

Hero Member
Jan 10, 2017
392
144
Hi Seniors ,
I got my Hearing date 31st March 2020, i received 2 letters from RPD in one envelope
1ST Letter they asked for please disclose proof.............(asking for proof relating to my story )
2nd letter have put me in tensed situation

RPD TO IRCC Etobicoke

Rule 26 Exclusion- Section F(a),(b) or (c)
Pursuant to Rule 26 of the RPD rules , You are hereby notified that RPD believes that section F of article 1 of united nation convention relating to the ststus of refugees may apply to the claim of the person named above . In the RPD Opinion , the Minister's participation may be helpful in the full and propoer hearing of the claim. In particular the RPD belives that the refugee claimant may have :

[...] commited a serious non political crime outside the country of refugee prior to his admission to that country as a refugee

Please note that the hearing of this claim is scheduled for march 21,2020 , If the Minister wishes to intervene ,they must do so before the date fixed for the hearing.

This was the matter in second letter , i dont have any criminality in canada as well as any country or my home country ,i dont know what RPD found in my story to write this , Is my case weak or it is negative impact or what i am not getting it any thing. Any one experiencing this ? can any one help me out or guide me ?
Thanks
I know this would be very stressful but it's really important to be prepare for this. I'd recommend you to talk to your lawyer and take his or her opinion on this matter. Good luck.
 

Jalalcananda

Hero Member
May 24, 2018
861
929
Hi Seniors ,
I got my Hearing date 31st March 2020, i received 2 letters from RPD in one envelope
1ST Letter they asked for please disclose proof.............(asking for proof relating to my story )
2nd letter have put me in tensed situation

RPD TO IRCC Etobicoke

Rule 26 Exclusion- Section F(a),(b) or (c)
Pursuant to Rule 26 of the RPD rules , You are hereby notified that RPD believes that section F of article 1 of united nation convention relating to the ststus of refugees may apply to the claim of the person named above . In the RPD Opinion , the Minister's participation may be helpful in the full and propoer hearing of the claim. In particular the RPD belives that the refugee claimant may have :

[...] commited a serious non political crime outside the country of refugee prior to his admission to that country as a refugee

Please note that the hearing of this claim is scheduled for march 21,2020 , If the Minister wishes to intervene ,they must do so before the date fixed for the hearing.

This was the matter in second letter , i dont have any criminality in canada as well as any country or my home country ,i dont know what RPD found in my story to write this , Is my case weak or it is negative impact or what i am not getting it any thing. Any one experiencing this ? can any one help me out or guide me ?
Thanks
I think it is ok. The minister will not intervene and your hearing will be probably postponed just the day before hearing to give the minister enough time to reply. It happened for me and the minister sent only a GCMS copy and also my information from the USA visa office as a94 pages file. The hearing was postponed for 2 months and I got accepted without presence of minister representative.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hilal86

hilal86

Star Member
Sep 9, 2019
76
11
I think it is ok. The minister will not intervene and your hearing will be probably postponed just the day before hearing to give the minister enough time to reply. It happened for me and the minister sent only a GCMS copy and also my information from the USA visa office as a94 pages file. The hearing was postponed for 2 months and I got accepted without presence of minister representative.
Thank you bro. I dont want it to get postponed, i have not done any crime.
 

Faisalkhan555

Hero Member
Apr 14, 2020
229
60
Hi Seniors ,
I got my Hearing date 31st March 2020, i received 2 letters from RPD in one envelope
1ST Letter they asked for please disclose proof.............(asking for proof relating to my story )
2nd letter have put me in tensed situation

RPD TO IRCC Etobicoke

Rule 26 Exclusion- Section F(a),(b) or (c)
Pursuant to Rule 26 of the RPD rules , You are hereby notified that RPD believes that section F of article 1 of united nation convention relating to the ststus of refugees may apply to the claim of the person named above . In the RPD Opinion , the Minister's participation may be helpful in the full and propoer hearing of the claim. In particular the RPD belives that the refugee claimant may have :

[...] commited a serious non political crime outside the country of refugee prior to his admission to that country as a refugee

Please note that the hearing of this claim is scheduled for march 21,2020 , If the Minister wishes to intervene ,they must do so before the date fixed for the hearing.

This was the matter in second letter , i dont have any criminality in canada as well as any country or my home country ,i dont know what RPD found in my story to write this , Is my case weak or it is negative impact or what i am not getting it any thing. Any one experiencing this ? can any one help me out or guide me ?
Thanks
Did you come from USA to canada and are you from Pakistan?
 

IcloudUser1985

Star Member
Jul 5, 2021
73
19
I think it is ok. The minister will not intervene and your hearing will be probably postponed just the day before hearing to give the minister enough time to reply. It happened for me and the minister sent only a GCMS copy and also my information from the USA visa office as a94 pages file. The hearing was postponed for 2 months and I got accepted without presence of minister representative.

Hi, Were you accepted without a hearing? Because we received same exact mail, our hearing was also postponed same axact day, And now we have a hearing coming next month
 
Last edited:

jn2024

Newbie
May 5, 2024
4
0
If you weren't commit any crime then your hearing should be fine and IRB must have made mistake. Don't worry, be prepare.
...as experts in this matter, I believe you have come across several cases in which the minister refused to intervene. So, how can the Minister's refusal to intervene be interpreted?
 

Jalalcananda

Hero Member
May 24, 2018
861
929
...as experts in this matter, I believe you have come across several cases in which the minister refused to intervene. So, how can the Minister's refusal to intervene be interpreted?
that is a good thing. I had same experience in 2018. That refuse to intervene means that minister doesn't have any problems with it and is not interested to try to be against it.
 

jn2024

Newbie
May 5, 2024
4
0
that is a good thing. I had same experience in 2018. That refuse to intervene means that minister doesn't have any problems with it and is not interested to try to be against it.
Okay Thank you... so, this means that whenever the minister refuses to intervene, the case always ends up having a positive outcome in favor of the asylum seeker. Right?