Yes, I am booked for programs.By program scheduled do you mean events in your home country where you will be performing?
did you include all those in the file? including contracts? Showing that tickets are sold?Yes, I am booked for programs.
Canada doesn't really look at the only son of mother etc, here kids often move out of the home at age 18. They are treated as adults on their own and daughters are just as important children as sons in Canada. Also many only sons of their parents come to Canada to try to get PR here and are separated from their parents for many years in hopes they can invite them later on Supervisa or sponsor for PR. Your wife and children on the other hand are good ties to your home country assuming they were staying back.No, I just mentioned my family is here and as i obey rules with other countries, I will come back home and will not violate any law.
I thought the family form I filled will indicate that I am the only son and my mother, wife and children are here.
I know you didn't ask me, but its not assistant its assets.@Bryanna Pls help and guide what I do next...What is meant by "personal assistant and financial status"
How can I clear these objections and reapply...
Regards
Thank you for answer,I know you didn't ask me, but its not assistant its assets.
Asset meaning, property, land, car etc...things you own in your name that you wouldn't leave behind.
You seem very desperate for someone who only wants to come for a 9-day vacation.Thank you for answer,
But I have one property, prchased (2010)
2 car 2 two wheelers. (Expensive)
Mutual funds running since (2015)
20kcad balance, attested bank statement.
I deposit all documents....
Thank you for reply.You seem very desperate for someone who only wants to come for a 9-day vacation.
IRCC didn't believe that you are a tourist. Your purpose of travel has been suspected and they think that you aren't a tourist.
Frankly, you don't sound like a tourist. It's coming across quite clearly that you are coming for something more than just sightseeing. The obvious inference is that you are coming to work - you said that you are a "famous devotional singer". You could easily be coming here to perform.
If you can't satisfy IRCC that you are a tourist, it doesn't matter what documents you provide. You will keep getting denied. You are focusing only on your financial assets, but you're not really addressing the "purpose of visit" objection.
Now further, How I satisfy Officer that I am a genuine tourist. Which I am, pls suggest. In genuine, I don't have intentions to work there, or perform there.You seem very desperate for someone who only wants to come for a 9-day vacation.
IRCC didn't believe that you are a tourist. Your purpose of travel has been suspected and they think that you aren't a tourist.
Frankly, you don't sound like a tourist. It's coming across quite clearly that you are coming for something more than just sightseeing. The obvious inference is that you are coming to work - you said that you are a "famous devotional singer". You could easily be coming here to perform.
If you can't satisfy IRCC that you are a tourist, it doesn't matter what documents you provide. You will keep getting denied. You are focusing only on your financial assets, but you're not really addressing the "purpose of visit" objection.
Thank you @Jets13 for your valuable suggestions.I know you didn't ask me, but its not assistant its assets.
Asset meaning, property, land, car etc...things you own in your name that you wouldn't leave behind.
I see that you have not taken into consideration my explanations of your refusal reasons, or suggestions to include your performance contracts in your file....so I will leave this thread as you prefer others reply.
Good explanation.but then how come a 34 year old recently divorced Mexican woman can enter thw country even though her intentions were reported to immigration and refug3 department with so many emails?(i sent several emails to inform the customs that she'll stay more than she declares and she'll work illegally as a visitor.i think there's a huge discrimination.but why?the age factor is playing a lot these days...IRCC is thinking that through a visitor visa you might be coming to find a job or not leave the country.
These officers pretty well know that people above 50-55 wont even think of migrating to Canada right now, so visas for them are easy, unless a red flag.
The best way to rethink your application is to - Think yourself as the officer who's approving the application and what evidences are you looking to make sure this person will do as stated in his/her application.
Why did they not study my travel history that I m a genuine person. And never stay any country more than 15days...Good explanation.but then how come a 34 year old recently divorced Mexican woman can enter thw country even though her intentions were reported to immigration and refug3 department with so many emails?(i sent several emails to inform the customs that she'll stay more than she declares and she'll work illegally as a visitor.i think there's a huge discrimination.but why?
It's difficult to understand the logic on their decision.why she didWhy did they not study my travel history that I m a genuine person. And never stay any country more than 15days...