one of my brother is taking Entecavir and other one is taking Tenofovir. and they will be coming Alberta.russellx said:What medication(s) are they on? It all depends on that. And their intended destination(Province).
Russ
one of my brother is taking Entecavir and other one is taking Tenofovir. and they will be coming Alberta.russellx said:What medication(s) are they on? It all depends on that. And their intended destination(Province).
Russ
I sponsord my my family my parents and two brother back in 2010. I was searching and some are saying under Family category medical inamissibility under excess demand is waived?russellx said:What medication(s) are they on? It all depends on that. And their intended destination(Province).
Russ
No - it's not waived in your case. It's only waived for spousal sponsorship. Medical inadmissibility applies for parent (and their dependents) sponsorship.ASHMAJ said:I sponsord my my family my parents and two brother back in 2010. I was searching and some are saying under Family category medical inamissibility under excess demand is waived?
Hiquresa1 said:Current my ECAS shows "Medicals have been received". Since Jan 12.
Appreciate if some one can relate to this experience. whether this ECAS msg regarding medicals means PASS?
canuck_in_uk said:Hi
It means exactly what it says: the medical results have been received. This does not mean the medical has been passed.
ottawat said:Lulud,
did your grandmother do the medicals in buchrest
No, they will not accept such promises because they are in no way legally enforceable.dr feras said:Quick question, among the supporting documents when someone responds to a fairness letter, like bank statements and plan etc, do they take into consideration a letter from a family relative who is a canadian citizen, very wealthy as he is a senior consultant in chest medicine and a manager of a big hospital in canada with clean record, stating that he is offering his support to cover any extra costs?
What also still confuses me, is from reading about other people's experiences, one important aspect in answering a fairness letter is having a clear plan including school bookings, purchasing private health insurance etc. Now how can I do such things and waste money when the child is not accompanying me to begin with?
Yes, the same thing can apply, hence why it is so very difficult to fight a medical inadmissibility ruling. It isn't about showing you have money. It's about showing how IRCC overestimated the medical costs or how the costs will be defrayed by aid organizations instead of the Canadian healthcare system.dr feras said:Doesnt the same thing apply to proof of funds to cover such costs? If they estimate it at say 50k, and i manage to get family help and put it in my account, since the child is not accompanying, who says ill have that kind of money when i apply to sponsor him in future? And by then, he will exempt from excessive demand