you understand my point of view now when I tell you people should be banned temporarily from applying when they reject their ITA. although he has a proof from CIC that his application will be accepted if he chooses to wait and submit it once he fulfills the experience period, yet he still wants to reject it and wait so he wont lose due a tie breaker. go figure how many times he will reject it and take someone else's chance!
Many in this forum called me selfish for such demand, but honestly, who is more selfish, I or him? think about it please.
I did understand your point of view, i just thought that person's situation in particular was understandable. I don't think your stance is selfish at all, quite the contrary you're thinking of people who are being penalised by those who repeatedly rejected ITAs.
I do agree with your larger point that it's an issue, the question is what would be the best solution? I think a temporary ban might have unintended consequences, because there are genuine people who may have to reject an ITA because of reasons beyond their control. With the way cut-off scores are fluctuating, it might cost them their chance if they got barred.
It is an issue which i think needs to be addressed. Maybe a temporary bar for the next draw or next 2 draws.
At the same time, maybe IRCC should have an option where you can deactivate your profile without withdrawing it, this way you stay out of the draws but you keep your submission date for a potential tie-breaker.
Taken to the extreme, you could have someone in the pool, qualify for an ITA in each draw, reject every time, and basically cost someone a place for every draw during the year. There was someone on the forum who i think rejected 4 or 5 ITAs for a small issue.
It's a problem.
