Preparing numbers and arguments from thin air helps no one.
A guy who predicted CRS 470 to be the lower threshold in 2017 using numbers, and then seeing CRS 468 as the highest the cut off ever went in 2017 for a non program specific draw, should realize he is bad at using numbers. So there is going to be a backlash if you simply use numbers and use no logic!
I agree that everybody should try their best to increase their CRS and I feel that's what everybody who wants to achieve this dream is doing right now. The increased CRS cut offs are due to folks increasing their CRS scores and it is not only due to new entrants.
I'm not good at numbers and the statistical analysis. But as far as I understood he was recently talking about the "overheating" phenomenon, which describes current situation better than anything I've recently read from others. This might be proven wrong a later time and I would be glad if it was but strangely enough it seems to be the most plausible explanation right now. I mean, can anybody really defeat today the "overheating" theory by @vensak?