hang on .. there are many I read have not got the ITA emails .. I am waiting as well with 427 points ..robinsonjoel said:I might die :-\
I just saw it now. I ptibably got it ealier, but i only get 400mb of data on my Canadian phone, so i dont turn data on, so i just got home and turned wifi on and saw the email!!SaintNishant said:Congratulations !! you got the email now or saw it now ?
you my friend are a beastabhishek_89 said:Remember this prediction which I made 5 days back! I was spot on with the CRS cut off of 423! ITA count is 140 more than my prediction! Congrats guys
Any predictions for the next draw??!abhishek_89 said:Remember this prediction which I made 5 days back! I was spot on with the CRS cut off of 423! ITA count is 140 more than my prediction! Congrats guys
I am waiting too....SaintNishant said:hang on .. there are many I read have not got the ITA emails .. I am waiting as well with 427 points ..
limestone said:I see the conflict you are pointing, but then "in theory" they can reduce PNP CRS requirements accordingly.
I think the fall is not happening by chance, it is falling by CIC design. When they stopped giving 600 pts for jobs (and convert to 50 and 200), they cut low CRS candidates ability to leapfrog with job arrangement pts. I think this applies mostly to inland applications, since outland job arrangement practically low-low chances.
Please check draw #48 cutoff 786!!! Meaning someone with 186 CRS+600 pts achieved ITA. 186!? (even if you add current 200pts still 386pts)
To increase the influx of candidates with higher HC pts, I believe CIC designed point values, in a way to reach 400s in cutoffs. May be even slightly lower. In this points situation, like I said above, PNP can still function, if they reduce PNP CRS requirements accordingly. They will help ppl with CRS 300 to 400.
I personally think, the economic benefit gained from a candidate, with 300+ has a lot of HC value compared to 186. Hence, CIC is executing this.
BR
limestone said:Well, above is what I posted some weeks ago. My estimates for -then- upcoming rounds.
- As long as no PNP points are discharged. And invites contnue ~3500
- Based on candidate CRS distribution is more less same in July 2016 report (https://c.ymcdn.com/sites/www.cerc.ca/resource/resmgr/government_relations/Express_entry_national_stake.pdf)
- And assuming number of candidates in pool was ~20,000 before draw 55.
round 55 high 430s - It was 441
round 56 low 430s - It was 434
round 57 low 420s - I predict 423 to 425
round 58 mid 410s -
round 59 mid 400s - this is what I hope for
I think it will pitch a bit high, but definitely range bound...they also released the list of people in the pool as of April 7th, 2017. Eventually, scores will drop to 380 range i guess, but could year end. With changes coming in June, it will be interesting to know how it will impact CRS rounds of invitation.elzsb said:Any predictions for the next draw??!
Please confirm what you mean by they also released the list of people in the pool as of April 7th, 2017.robinsonjoel said:I think it will pitch a bit high, but definitely range bound...they also released the list of people in the pool as of April 7th, 2017. Eventually, scores will drop to 380 range i guess, but could year end. With changes coming in June, it will be interesting to know how it will impact CRS rounds of invitation.