+1(514) 937-9445 or Toll-free (Canada & US) +1 (888) 947-9445
fatani said:
And I think you are kid your statement is childish. As ajkidwai said anyone with 400+ would have CLB 8-9 level of english and good work exp and will be in early 30s. This system is made to give canada a more stable immigration process this system is made in view that highly skilled and qualified applicants are taken.

I think you know nothing about canadian immigration in the past before Express entry anyone with 67/100 points would have qualified to file a paper application regardless of their age language abilities work exp. That was the reason that huge paper application backlog was created. All they needed was to get 67/100 points.

My 50 yr old uncle got immigration in 2010 who would have barely got 300 points in Express entry. Lots of people like him got immigration. With this system everyone who enters the pool has minimum 67 points out of 100. But they need good CRS in order to apply. In Express Entry pool lots of applicants are in the range of 200-350. They all have 67 out of 100 points but they cant apply because they will not become successful with this low human capital scores. In the past all of them would have got in. So get your facts right before posting any comment.

I will not make personal attacks like you just did. But maybe you should inform yourself about WHY people like your uncle in 2010 could get in at that time and would not be able to migrate today with the EE system. It's called ranking. And obviously people with 450 for example or 500 are more attractive to canada than those with lower ranked characteristics. People don't like looking the truth in the eye, but that's how it is.
 
johnmunch said:
Please do not jump to conclusions and notice the quotation marks. Relative to people with 450+ scores, those with less are considered "less desirable". If not, why rank candidates? This is a rhetorical queston. As you mentioned about Ontario, it's all about getting pnp money.

My friend, getting a PNP is a matter of luck, because people of the same experience and qualification and with the same CRS score are in the pool. The difference between them is just 600 point, because some get nominated, some dont.

Nominations do not measure the quality of an applicant. My friend is a CA, CLB 9 with over 18 years of experience. Because of his age being 44, his CRS is 357. The prime applicant for him is his wife, a double degree holder, CLB 9 and mid 30s. So my friend, getting in 400s isnt easy. And the quality of the people within this range is the best. The only drawback is that they do not have Canadian experience. And any nomination is a bonus.

As far as PNPS are concerned, when the CRS cutt off was 786, there was someone sitting in the pool with a 186 score ( the 30th November 2016 draw), who got a nomination with 600 points and was issued ITA. Except for Ontario, there is no cut-off for other provinces on CRS scores.
 
Is anyone predicting a draw on 29th?
 
xpressentry said:
Is anyone predicting a draw on 29th?

My mind says no, heart says yes.............CRS 429-431 :P :P :P :P
 
Expecting on 5th of April, 438 points
 
ajkidwai said:
My friend, getting a PNP is a matter of luck, because people of the same experience and qualification and with the same CRS score are in the pool. The difference between them is just 600 point, because some get nominated, some dont.

Nominations do not measure the quality of an applicant. My friend is a CA, CLB 9 with over 18 years of experience. Because of his age being 44, his CRS is 357. The prime applicant for him is his wife, a double degree holder, CLB 9 and mid 30s. So my friend, getting in 400s isnt easy. And the quality of the people within this range is the best. The only drawback is that they do not have Canadian experience. And any nomination is a bonus.

As far as PNPS are concerned, when the CRS cutt off was 786, there was someone sitting in the pool with a 186 score ( the 30th November 2016 draw), who got a nomination with 600 points and was issued ITA. Except for Ontario, there is no cut-off for other provinces on CRS scores.

I fully agree with you. But people I think interpret "worthy" literally. This is not my intention. I'm just saying canada will take people with higher scores relative to lower ones. I remember the guy with 186. And that proves my point. Pnp's are a gold mine for provinces. So ircc will not want to drop scores too much and will take its migrants from the pool of highly skilled applicants ie with 400+ points.
 
johnmunch said:
I fully agree with you. But people I think interpret "worthy" literally. This is not my intention. I'm just saying canada will take people with higher scores relative to lower ones. I remember the guy with 186. And that proves my point. Pnp's are a gold mine for provinces. So ircc will not want to drop scores too much and take its migrants from the pool of highly skilled applicants ie with 400+ points.

With English as a second language for most people here, assume all words are taken literally.
 
johnmunch said:
I fully agree with you. But people I think interpret "worthy" literally. This is not my intention. I'm just saying canada will take people with higher scores relative to lower ones. I remember the guy with 186. And that proves my point. Pnp's are a gold mine for provinces. So ircc will not want to drop scores too much and will take its migrants from the pool of highly skilled applicants ie with 400+ points.

But John, provinces can still select and make money (big time) with all 200 and 300+ CRS. Do you think, they make more money with 400+ people?
 
Pawshi said:
From my point of view, rejection rate would be higher. In last three months, I have seen many cases where applicants have created multiple profiles with different email IDs and with the same passport number for primary applicant. This is strongly no no from IRCC and those profiles with ITAs will get rejected for sure.

I think so too! +1
 
xpressentry said:
Is anyone predicting a draw on 29th?

I though you got your ITA? Or waiting for next draw did become a hobby of yours:D
 
A draw on April 5th would be a more reasonable assumption, although I have given up trying to predict CIC. ;D
 
AlliBatista said:
A draw on April 5th would be a more reasonable assumption, although I have given up trying to predict CIC. ;D

Hello Aliibatista! I thought you got your ITA in the previous draw! Yes, xpressentry got his/her ITA in the previous draw :)