JALT said:
They are good points, and I agree. But also don't forget to include children. The person in their mid 30's might bring 2 children with them who are prime to become a future Canadian workforce. The younger applicants are also just the right age to start having children, in which case they might not want the upheaval of leaving Canada again. So there's costs and benefits to everything.
I did read somewhere that it was suggested that IRCC reduce the penalty for age for senior executives. They're big wage earners/tax payers from the start but most senior execs are over 40 yrs old and they can't move here because of their Express Entry points... and as we all know it's near impossible to get an LMIA when you're outside of Canada (unless you're in IT etc...)
Here is the catch - young children are mostly burden to the social system (education, health system). But their status in certain ways my not be the same as inland born canadian citizens.
Here is another funny fact - quebec was giving additional points just for the fact that you have small children (for first 3 and the smaller they are the more points you get). Why did they do that? According my opinion the calculation is simple:
1. people will usualy not go over 3 kids (it is way too expensive in Canada)
2. A child born outside Canada even if it achieves Canadian citizenship later does not give the same right for citizenship to the descendants as the inland born)
3. A child born outside Canada means much less trouble for Canada in case parents will decide to leave.
4. Small child will follow parents if they decide to leave Canada, rather than to become independend and decide to stay and keep their residency
5. And small children will fuel specially paid system of kindergartens and nannies so the parents will use up Money faster
6. Alternatively small children can force 1 parent to stay home, where the remaining one is usually too burdend to be able to earn enough money.
Now when it comes to younger people, after landing in Canada, they usually postpone family planning as they need to stabilise first (unless they have it and if they have it the points above apply).
While people in mid 30 have either already teenagers rather than smaller children and again they do tend to prioritize family (if they still do not have children and want them they will rather have them as they can still go back to their career back home).
And yes correctly as you said, this system is a bit trap for Canada when it comes to small amount of experienced ones they really want. As the new system will mostly produced young semi skilled labour or young academics without that much experience of how nasty life can be sometimes.
But my guess is that rather than adjusting score for age, they will more like push the role to attracting executives on provinces (which is already happening if you check some of provinces requirements you can see the patern there).